Comparison Between Experimental Low-Cost and High Grade out of the Box Receivers

This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of an experimental low-cost Raspberry Pi-based software-defined radio (SDR) ADS-B receiver (approx. $160 total cost) and a high-grade commercial uAvionix PingRx Pro ADS-B unit integrated with a PixHawk Cube Orange flight controller (approx. $742). In a side-by-side field deployment, both systems simultaneously monitored ADS-B broadcasts from commercial and general aviation aircraft. Key performance metrics such as total ADS-B messages received, unique aircraft counts, overlap in aircraft detected by both receivers, and maximum detection range were recorded and analyzed. The SDR-based receiver captured a higher overall volume of ADS-B messages (about 1.32 million vs 0.97 million for PingRx Pro) and tracked more aircraft in total, demonstrating a high data yield for its cost. However, the PingRx Pro excelled in long-range, high-altitude detection. It consistently picked up aircraft flying above 10,000 ft at distances beyond the SDR’s reach and demonstrated superior resilience to radio frequency (RF) noise and interference. Approximately 77% of the 4,670 total unique aircraft were detected by both receivers, reflecting substantial coverage overlap, while PingRx’s extended range accounted for most of the uniquely detected flights. This study illustrates that the SDR solution, despite its limitations in range and noise rejection, offers an affordability advantage that enables scalable deployment of multiple units.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3670
Primary Topic
Iterative Learning Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Experimental Low-Cost and High Grade out of the Box Receivers

Soroush Karimi, Nathan Hutchins, Alan M. Hubbard
Iterative Learning Control Systems
article

Comparison Between Experimental Low-Cost and High Grade out of the Box Receivers

Soroush Karimi, Nathan Hutchins, Alan M. Hubbard
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of an experimental low-cost Raspberry Pi-based software-defined radio (SDR) ADS-B receiver (approx. $160 total cost) and a high-grade commercial uAvionix PingRx Pro ADS-B unit integrated with a PixHawk Cube Orange flight controller (approx. $742). In a side-by-side field deployment, both systems simultaneously monitored ADS-B broadcasts from commercial and general aviation aircraft. Key performance metrics such as total ADS-B messages received, unique aircraft counts, overlap in aircraft detected by both receivers, and maximum detection range were recorded and analyzed. The SDR-based receiver captured a higher overall volume of ADS-B messages (about 1.32 million vs 0.97 million for PingRx Pro) and tracked more aircraft in total, demonstrating a high data yield for its cost. However, the PingRx Pro excelled in long-range, high-altitude detection. It consistently picked up aircraft flying above 10,000 ft at distances beyond the SDR’s reach and demonstrated superior resilience to radio frequency (RF) noise and interference. Approximately 77% of the 4,670 total unique aircraft were detected by both receivers, reflecting substantial coverage overlap, while PingRx’s extended range accounted for most of the uniquely detected flights. This study illustrates that the SDR solution, despite its limitations in range and noise rejection, offers an affordability advantage that enables scalable deployment of multiple units.

University of Tulsa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Iterative Learning Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.