Numerical Comparison of Propulsion Configurations for Stratospheric Airships: Stabilization and Control Effort

This paper presents a comparative analysis of propulsion system architectures for a stratospheric airship in the context of stabilization efficiency. Three configurations are considered: one with a single gimbaled thruster, one with two thrusters on the body, and one with three thrusters located on the tail. A dynamic model of the airship was developed using the SILCROAD simulation library in MATLAB, incorporating equations of motion and a stability augmentation system (SAS) based on proportional-integral feedback control. Optimization of control gains was performed using Ansys OptiSLang with multi-objective and single-objective criteria that included stabilization time and control effort. The results indicate that the single-thruster configuration achieves the best trade-off between stability performance and energy efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3191
Primary Topic
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Comparison of Propulsion Configurations for Stratospheric Airships: Stabilization and Control Effort

Carlo E.D. Riboldi, Mostafa Hassanalian, Yan Pozhanka, Tyler Doyle
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
article

Numerical Comparison of Propulsion Configurations for Stratospheric Airships: Stabilization and Control Effort

Carlo E.D. Riboldi, Mostafa Hassanalian, Yan Pozhanka, Tyler Doyle
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of propulsion system architectures for a stratospheric airship in the context of stabilization efficiency. Three configurations are considered: one with a single gimbaled thruster, one with two thrusters on the body, and one with three thrusters located on the tail. A dynamic model of the airship was developed using the SILCROAD simulation library in MATLAB, incorporating equations of motion and a stability augmentation system (SAS) based on proportional-integral feedback control. Optimization of control gains was performed using Ansys OptiSLang with multi-objective and single-objective criteria that included stabilization time and control effort. The results indicate that the single-thruster configuration achieves the best trade-off between stability performance and energy efficiency.

New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.