Numerical Comparison of Propulsion Configurations for Stratospheric Airships: Stabilization and Control Effort
This paper presents a comparative analysis of propulsion system architectures for a stratospheric airship in the context of stabilization efficiency. Three configurations are considered: one with a single gimbaled thruster, one with two thrusters on the body, and one with three thrusters located on the tail. A dynamic model of the airship was developed using the SILCROAD simulation library in MATLAB, incorporating equations of motion and a stability augmentation system (SAS) based on proportional-integral feedback control. Optimization of control gains was performed using Ansys OptiSLang with multi-objective and single-objective criteria that included stabilization time and control effort. The results indicate that the single-thruster configuration achieves the best trade-off between stability performance and energy efficiency.
Authors
- Carlo E.D. Riboldi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-3134)
- Mostafa Hassanalian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2229-5028)
- Yan Pozhanka
- Tyler Doyle
Institutions
- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (US)
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3191
- Primary Topic
- Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00