Reliability Requires Using Direct Supply, Not Recycling, for Space Life Support

Space life support provides atmosphere, water, temperature and humidity control, waste management, and fire suppression for the spacecraft crew. Failures of these functions can harm the astronauts and serious accidents have occurred. NASA has worked to develop recycling life support systems since the 1960’s and has used them on the International Space Station (ISS) for nearly two decades, but all other US space missions have used the direct supply of life support materials. Recycling systems have been justified as saving launch mass and reducing cost for long missions, where the total mass of resupply materials is very large. But now a greatly reduced launch cost makes direct supply much less expensive than recycling for all projected future human missions. Direct supply uses flight proven tanks and cannisters that are much simpler, cheaper, and more reliable than recycling systems. The ISS life support system has had frequent failures that create high risk and require excessive crew time to repair. Space life support should be designed to have very high reliability and minimum risk. Achieving high reliability requires using direct supply life support and precludes using complex undependable recycling systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-4003
Primary Topic
Space Exploration and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability Requires Using Direct Supply, Not Recycling, for Space Life Support

Harry Jones
1 links
Space Exploration and Technology
article

Reliability Requires Using Direct Supply, Not Recycling, for Space Life Support

Harry Jones
article en

Abstract

Space life support provides atmosphere, water, temperature and humidity control, waste management, and fire suppression for the spacecraft crew. Failures of these functions can harm the astronauts and serious accidents have occurred. NASA has worked to develop recycling life support systems since the 1960’s and has used them on the International Space Station (ISS) for nearly two decades, but all other US space missions have used the direct supply of life support materials. Recycling systems have been justified as saving launch mass and reducing cost for long missions, where the total mass of resupply materials is very large. But now a greatly reduced launch cost makes direct supply much less expensive than recycling for all projected future human missions. Direct supply uses flight proven tanks and cannisters that are much simpler, cheaper, and more reliable than recycling systems. The ISS life support system has had frequent failures that create high risk and require excessive crew time to repair. Space life support should be designed to have very high reliability and minimum risk. Achieving high reliability requires using direct supply life support and precludes using complex undependable recycling systems.

Ames Research Center (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Space Exploration and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reliability Requires Using Direct Supply, Not Recycling, for Space Life Support — Harry Jones · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS