Dragonfly CFD Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

This work demonstrates an application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model validation and model-form uncertainty quantification for the NASA Dragonfly lander in its Preparation for Powered Flight (PPF) configuration. A multi-fidelity CFD workflow is employed, utilizing both mid-fidelity Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and high-fidelity Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES) models. Surrogate models are trained from CFD simulations to ingest operational condition uncertainty and propagate uncertainty to loads of interest. An area metric validation quantity is used to establish model-form uncertainty. FZ area metric values based on RANS CFD results alone indicate high discrepancy, >12 N, near pure descent orientations, high descent velocity, and high lander rotor RPM. These errors are reduced to <4 N through targeted IDDES simulations. MZ error is consistent between the different model fidelities considered. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure in quantifying model-form uncertainty and identifying need for increased model fidelity for downstream vehicle performance simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3314
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dragonfly CFD Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

Kalki Sharma, Peter F. Lorber, Dustin Coleman, Patrick Bowles et al.
2 citations
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
2.80
article

Dragonfly CFD Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

Kalki Sharma, Peter F. Lorber, Dustin Coleman, Patrick Bowles, Gino Perrotta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work demonstrates an application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model validation and model-form uncertainty quantification for the NASA Dragonfly lander in its Preparation for Powered Flight (PPF) configuration. A multi-fidelity CFD workflow is employed, utilizing both mid-fidelity Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and high-fidelity Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES) models. Surrogate models are trained from CFD simulations to ingest operational condition uncertainty and propagate uncertainty to loads of interest. An area metric validation quantity is used to establish model-form uncertainty. FZ area metric values based on RANS CFD results alone indicate high discrepancy, >12 N, near pure descent orientations, high descent velocity, and high lander rotor RPM. These errors are reduced to <4 N through targeted IDDES simulations. MZ error is consistent between the different model fidelities considered. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure in quantifying model-form uncertainty and identifying need for increased model fidelity for downstream vehicle performance simulations.

Lockheed Martin (United States) (US), Lockheed Martin (Canada) (CA), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dragonfly CFD Validation and Uncertainty Quantification — Kalki Sharma, Peter F. Lorber, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS