Incorporating Launched Satellite Functionality Into a Composite Constellation Optimization Framework

For many decades, space was a region occupied primarily by national agencies. Only recently have commercial entities begun to dominate and define space. This paradigm shift in space actors presents an opportunity for national agencies which, rather than creating and operating their own satellite constellation, can utilize commercial assets through contracting agreements. Working with contractors can significantly bolster an agency’s capabilities, but it can be difficult to identify exactly which contractors to partner with for optimal performance. The preexisting MASCOT framework described in a previous paper provides a means to optimize which commercial partners (and which of their satellites) to acquire to form the most effective constellation. However, MASCOT lacks the functionality to compare a rented commercial satellite to an agency-built, -launched, and-operated satellite. Additionally, MASCOT only considers the cost as a fixed upfront quantity. To extend the applicability of the framework, this paper presents a method to incorporate launched satellites and time-dependent cost information. It is shown that incorporating the aforementioned functionality increases the scope of the decisions that can be made with the framework and allows for a more wholistic view of the design space and its trade-offs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-4010
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Design and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating Launched Satellite Functionality Into a Composite Constellation Optimization Framework

Alexia P. Payan, Dimitri N. Mavris, James A. Tsangarides
1 links
Spacecraft Design and Technology
article

Incorporating Launched Satellite Functionality Into a Composite Constellation Optimization Framework

Alexia P. Payan, Dimitri N. Mavris, James A. Tsangarides
article en

Abstract

For many decades, space was a region occupied primarily by national agencies. Only recently have commercial entities begun to dominate and define space. This paradigm shift in space actors presents an opportunity for national agencies which, rather than creating and operating their own satellite constellation, can utilize commercial assets through contracting agreements. Working with contractors can significantly bolster an agency’s capabilities, but it can be difficult to identify exactly which contractors to partner with for optimal performance. The preexisting MASCOT framework described in a previous paper provides a means to optimize which commercial partners (and which of their satellites) to acquire to form the most effective constellation. However, MASCOT lacks the functionality to compare a rented commercial satellite to an agency-built, -launched, and-operated satellite. Additionally, MASCOT only considers the cost as a fixed upfront quantity. To extend the applicability of the framework, this paper presents a method to incorporate launched satellites and time-dependent cost information. It is shown that incorporating the aforementioned functionality increases the scope of the decisions that can be made with the framework and allows for a more wholistic view of the design space and its trade-offs.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Spacecraft Design and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incorporating Launched Satellite Functionality Into a Composite Constellation Optimization Framework — Alexia P. Payan, Dimitri N. Mavris, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS