A Framework for Flying Qualities Testing of Highly Automated VTOL Aircraft
The aviation industry and regulatory authorities encounter significant challenges in deploying highly automated aircraft. A primary concern is the impracticality of flight testing mission-relevant tasks across a wide range of operating conditions to ensure the safety of automation systems. This challenge is particularly pronounced for vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft where assuring acceptable flying qualities is complicated by intricate flight control systems with over-actuated designs, complex aerodynamic effects such as interlacing propulsor wakes, and the operational demands of urban and adverse atmospheric conditions. To address these challenges, this paper outlines a framework for flying qualities testing put forth by the Automated Flying Qualities (AFQ) Committee which aims to establish best practices for flight testing and certifying VTOL aircraft. Key recommendations include: (i) the development of a unified and aircraft-agnostic framework for analyzing highly automated aircraft, grounded in linear systems theory, statistical and simulation-based evaluations, and targeted flight testing; (ii) the formulation of a unified definition of control loops applicable to highly automated flight control systems; and (iii) the introduction of a rating scheme for automated flying qualities, which builds upon the Cooper-Harper Rating system to evaluate an aircraft's performance, pilot workload, and machine compensation capabilities. This paper serves as a description of the challenges facing the testers, both in industry and regulatory authorities, on ensuring these aircraft are safe to operate. The proposed framework is designed to uncover latent flight control pathologies that could lead to catastrophic outcomes in scenarios where a qualified pilot is not actively engaged in the control loop. While these recommendations are particularly tailored for complex VTOL aircraft, they hold relevance for the broader category of highly automated aircraft.
Authors
- David Sizoo
- Alan Lawless
- Michael Feary
- Daniel Siqueira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-1890)
- Peter Schmidt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-9088)
- Marcel Menner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-7730)
- William Thomas O'Gorman
- Gaurav Makkar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-3636)
- Florian Holzapfel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-9186)
- Robert McKillip
- Marco Lotterio
- Virginia L. Stouffer
- David Webber
- Jeremy Ross
- Blaine Levedahl
- Johannes Van Houdt
- Herminio Lustosa
Institutions
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Embraer (Brazil) (BR)
- Transport Canada (CA)
- Federal Aviation Administration (US)
- Aurora Flight Sciences (United States) (US)
- Aero-Tech Engineering (United States) (US)
- Transcend Engineering (United States) (US)
- Continuum Dynamics (United States) (US)
- Systems Technology (United States) (US)
- Honda (United States) (US)
- Scientific Aviation (United States) (US)
- Transition Technologies (Poland) (PL)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3571
- Primary Topic
- Aerospace and Aviation Technology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00