Transonic Buffet and Stall Flutter Predictions with a Tunable Turbulence Model for DPW-8/AePW-4

This paper presents progress towards the Fourth Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop (AePW-4) High-Angle Working Group (HAWG) and Buffet Working Group (BWG) by the team from RMIT University in collaboration with ANSYS Inc. The HAWG is concerned with modeling transonic stall flutter, while the BWG with modeling transonic shock buffet. For these complex nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic / aeroelastic problems, preliminary results show that-relative to conventional RANS turbulence models-the tunable Generalized k-w model can provide superior performance. For the HAWG, there is good agreement with the experimental dataset, however, a study of spatial and temporal convergence is still needed. For the BWG reasonable agreement with experimental data is observed for the two-dimensional airfoil test case, and the authors are now proceeding to model the NASA Common Research Model (CRM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3766
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transonic Buffet and Stall Flutter Predictions with a Tunable Turbulence Model for DPW-8/AePW-4

Pier Marzocca, Valerio Viti, Lewis Gene Clark, Luke Munholand et al.
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Transonic Buffet and Stall Flutter Predictions with a Tunable Turbulence Model for DPW-8/AePW-4

Pier Marzocca, Valerio Viti, Lewis Gene Clark, Luke Munholand, Michael Candon, Truman Gerner
article en

Abstract

This paper presents progress towards the Fourth Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop (AePW-4) High-Angle Working Group (HAWG) and Buffet Working Group (BWG) by the team from RMIT University in collaboration with ANSYS Inc. The HAWG is concerned with modeling transonic stall flutter, while the BWG with modeling transonic shock buffet. For these complex nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic / aeroelastic problems, preliminary results show that-relative to conventional RANS turbulence models-the tunable Generalized k-w model can provide superior performance. For the HAWG, there is good agreement with the experimental dataset, however, a study of spatial and temporal convergence is still needed. For the BWG reasonable agreement with experimental data is observed for the two-dimensional airfoil test case, and the authors are now proceeding to model the NASA Common Research Model (CRM).

Ansys (United States) (US), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.