Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD

The expense of computational methods that can accurately predict the tonal acoustic field in an aeroengine intake is a current limitation for understanding current and future challenges in aeroengine noise, such as the impact of increased flow distortion with UHBR (Ultra-High Bypass Ratio) turbofan designs. In this study, the intake propagation of shock-associated fan tone noise through a distorted inflow is considered. Three numerical methodologies are applied to explore novel methods for reducing the computational demand of representative and accurate calculations. The datum case considers the full intake domain with a fully structured computational mesh. A part-span approximation neglects low-span regions of the duct according to the observation that most of the interested acoustic content has energy focused towards the outer walls of the duct. Finally, a hybrid technique combines the earlier approaches by filling the previously neglected space with unstructured mesh. Both the part-span and hybrid methodologies unlock considerable computational savings. Both cases could sufficiently resolve the distorted flow field. The acoustic field at the first two Blade Passing Frequencies (BPFs) was considered for all cases. At the first BPF, both methodologies successfully represent the highest amplitude components. At the second BPF, more deviations were observed for the case that applied the part-span approximation, while the hybrid case results matched well with the datum case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-3749
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD

Long Wu, Joseph Binns, Alexander G. Wilson
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
article

Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD

Long Wu, Joseph Binns, Alexander G. Wilson
article en

Abstract

The expense of computational methods that can accurately predict the tonal acoustic field in an aeroengine intake is a current limitation for understanding current and future challenges in aeroengine noise, such as the impact of increased flow distortion with UHBR (Ultra-High Bypass Ratio) turbofan designs. In this study, the intake propagation of shock-associated fan tone noise through a distorted inflow is considered. Three numerical methodologies are applied to explore novel methods for reducing the computational demand of representative and accurate calculations. The datum case considers the full intake domain with a fully structured computational mesh. A part-span approximation neglects low-span regions of the duct according to the observation that most of the interested acoustic content has energy focused towards the outer walls of the duct. Finally, a hybrid technique combines the earlier approaches by filling the previously neglected space with unstructured mesh. Both the part-span and hybrid methodologies unlock considerable computational savings. Both cases could sufficiently resolve the distorted flow field. The acoustic field at the first two Blade Passing Frequencies (BPFs) was considered for all cases. At the first BPF, both methodologies successfully represent the highest amplitude components. At the second BPF, more deviations were observed for the case that applied the part-span approximation, while the hybrid case results matched well with the datum case.

University of Southampton (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.