Synergistic enhancement of sulfate resistance in recycled aggregate concrete through multi-pathway blocking via carbonation treatment and fly ash incorporation

Due to the large amount of construction waste generated, the use of recycled aggregates from waste concrete as a substitute for natural aggregates in concrete production has become a hot research topic. However, the poor durability, particularly the inadequate sulfate resistance, limits the widespread use of recycled aggregate concrete. This study aims to investigate the synergistic effect of recycled aggregate carbonation and fly ash incorporation on the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete. In this work, a sulfate wet-dry cycle test was employed to assess the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete with varying carbonation pressures of the aggregate (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 MPa) and fly ash contents (10 %, 20 %, and 30 %). Additionally, a novel experimental approach was applied to analyse the sulfate ion transport pathways in recycled aggregate concrete. The results indicate that both recycled aggregate carbonation and fly ash incorporation effectively enhance the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete. Carbonation treatment improves sulfate resistance in pathways involving old mortar, with an optimal pressure of 0.5 MPa. Fly ash enhances resistance in pathways involving new mortar, with an optimal content of 20 %. These methods show good compatibility. In sulfate wet-dry cycle test, the treated group (0.5 MPa carbonation and 20 % fly ash) exhibited a 146.9 % lower mass loss rate, a 2487 % higher relative compressive strength, and fewer harmful pores, similar to natural aggregate concrete. These findings confirm the effectiveness of multi-path synergistic blocking and provide important theoretical support for the engineering application of recycled aggregate concrete. • Carbonation enhances sulfate resistance by sealing old mortar cracks in recycled aggregates. • Fly ash reduces sulfate ingress via pore refinement and Ca(OH) 2 consumption in new mortar. • Combined carbonation and fly ash synergistically block all sulfate transport pathways. • Treated recycled concrete matches natural aggregate concrete's durability under sulfate attack.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142685
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic enhancement of sulfate resistance in recycled aggregate concrete through multi-pathway blocking via carbonation treatment and fly ash incorporation

Mingtao Zhang, Xuanrui Yu, Jiehong Li, Jiang Chen et al.
11 citations
Construction and Building Materials
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
11.07
article

Synergistic enhancement of sulfate resistance in recycled aggregate concrete through multi-pathway blocking via carbonation treatment and fly ash incorporation

Mingtao Zhang, Xuanrui Yu, Jiehong Li, Jiang Chen, Changming Bu, Jie Yu, Yu Yang, Yi Sun
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Due to the large amount of construction waste generated, the use of recycled aggregates from waste concrete as a substitute for natural aggregates in concrete production has become a hot research topic. However, the poor durability, particularly the inadequate sulfate resistance, limits the widespread use of recycled aggregate concrete. This study aims to investigate the synergistic effect of recycled aggregate carbonation and fly ash incorporation on the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete. In this work, a sulfate wet-dry cycle test was employed to assess the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete with varying carbonation pressures of the aggregate (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 MPa) and fly ash contents (10 %, 20 %, and 30 %). Additionally, a novel experimental approach was applied to analyse the sulfate ion transport pathways in recycled aggregate concrete. The results indicate that both recycled aggregate carbonation and fly ash incorporation effectively enhance the sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete. Carbonation treatment improves sulfate resistance in pathways involving old mortar, with an optimal pressure of 0.5 MPa. Fly ash enhances resistance in pathways involving new mortar, with an optimal content of 20 %. These methods show good compatibility. In sulfate wet-dry cycle test, the treated group (0.5 MPa carbonation and 20 % fly ash) exhibited a 146.9 % lower mass loss rate, a 2487 % higher relative compressive strength, and fewer harmful pores, similar to natural aggregate concrete. These findings confirm the effectiveness of multi-path synergistic blocking and provide important theoretical support for the engineering application of recycled aggregate concrete. • Carbonation enhances sulfate resistance by sealing old mortar cracks in recycled aggregates. • Fly ash reduces sulfate ingress via pore refinement and Ca(OH) 2 consumption in new mortar. • Combined carbonation and fly ash synergistically block all sulfate transport pathways. • Treated recycled concrete matches natural aggregate concrete's durability under sulfate attack.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 491
Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
11.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.