Performance Comparison of Recurrent Neural Network Variants for State of Charge Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries

This paper presents a comparative study of three widely used recurrent neural network (RNN) variants-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)-for predicting the State of Charge (SoC) of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). A key contribution of this work is the evaluation of these models under varying environmental and operational conditions, specifically using battery data (INR18650-20R) collected at three different ambient temperatures: $0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$, and $45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. The models are trained using the Dynamic Stress Test (DST) drive cycle and tested on two unseen drive cycles-Federal Urban Driving Schedule (FUDS) and the Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (US06)-without retraining, demonstrating their generalization capability. The performance of each model is assessed using standard evaluation metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination ($\mathrm{R}^{\mathbf{2}}$). Results indicate that all three RNN architectures provide accurate SoC predictions, with notable differences in performance under different conditions. This study provides valuable insights into the robustness and effectiveness of RNN-based approaches for real-time SoC estimation in EV battery management systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pectea61788.2025.11076478
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Recurrent Neural Network Variants for State of Charge Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries

K. Sundareswaran, T Mithun, M Kannan, P. Srinivasa Rao Nayak et al.
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Performance Comparison of Recurrent Neural Network Variants for State of Charge Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries

K. Sundareswaran, T Mithun, M Kannan, P. Srinivasa Rao Nayak, K Saneep
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of three widely used recurrent neural network (RNN) variants-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)-for predicting the State of Charge (SoC) of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). A key contribution of this work is the evaluation of these models under varying environmental and operational conditions, specifically using battery data (INR18650-20R) collected at three different ambient temperatures: $0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}, 25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$, and $45^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$. The models are trained using the Dynamic Stress Test (DST) drive cycle and tested on two unseen drive cycles-Federal Urban Driving Schedule (FUDS) and the Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (US06)-without retraining, demonstrating their generalization capability. The performance of each model is assessed using standard evaluation metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination ($\mathrm{R}^{\mathbf{2}}$). Results indicate that all three RNN architectures provide accurate SoC predictions, with notable differences in performance under different conditions. This study provides valuable insights into the robustness and effectiveness of RNN-based approaches for real-time SoC estimation in EV battery management systems.

National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli (IN), Altair Engineering (United States) (US), Institute of Applied Dermatology (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.