An Effectiveness Study Across Baseline and Learning-Based Force Estimation Methods on the da Vinci Research Kit Si System

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, such as through the da Vinci systems, improves precision and patient outcomes. However, da Vinci systems prior to da Vinci 5 lacked direct force-sensing capabilities, forcing surgeons to operate without the haptic feedback they get through laparoscopy. Our prior work restored force sensing through machine learning-based force estimation for an open-source surgical robotics research platform, the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK) Classic. This study extends our previous method to the newer dVRK system, the dVRK-Si. Additionally, we benchmark the performance of the learning-based algorithm against baseline methods (which make simplifying assumptions on the torque) to study how the two systems differ. In both systems, the learning-based method outperforms baselines, but the difference is much larger in the dVRK-Si. Nonetheless, dVRK-Si force estimation accuracy lags behind the dVRK Classic, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) 2 to 3 times higher. Further analysis reveals suboptimal PID control in the dVRK-Si. We hypothesize that this is because, unlike the dVRK Classic, the dVRK-Si is not mechanically balanced and exhibits more complex internal dynamics. This study advances the understanding of learning-based force estimation and is the first work to implement learning-based dynamics estimation of the new dVRK-Si system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmrb.2025.3589744
Primary Topic
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Effectiveness Study Across Baseline and Learning-Based Force Estimation Methods on the da Vinci Research Kit Si System

Hao Yang, Peter Kazanzides, Ayberk Acar, Anton Deguet et al.
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
article

An Effectiveness Study Across Baseline and Learning-Based Force Estimation Methods on the da Vinci Research Kit Si System

Hao Yang, Peter Kazanzides, Ayberk Acar, Anton Deguet, Keshuai Xu, Jie Ying Wu
article en

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, such as through the da Vinci systems, improves precision and patient outcomes. However, da Vinci systems prior to da Vinci 5 lacked direct force-sensing capabilities, forcing surgeons to operate without the haptic feedback they get through laparoscopy. Our prior work restored force sensing through machine learning-based force estimation for an open-source surgical robotics research platform, the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK) Classic. This study extends our previous method to the newer dVRK system, the dVRK-Si. Additionally, we benchmark the performance of the learning-based algorithm against baseline methods (which make simplifying assumptions on the torque) to study how the two systems differ. In both systems, the learning-based method outperforms baselines, but the difference is much larger in the dVRK-Si. Nonetheless, dVRK-Si force estimation accuracy lags behind the dVRK Classic, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) 2 to 3 times higher. Further analysis reveals suboptimal PID control in the dVRK-Si. We hypothesize that this is because, unlike the dVRK Classic, the dVRK-Si is not mechanically balanced and exhibits more complex internal dynamics. This study advances the understanding of learning-based force estimation and is the first work to implement learning-based dynamics estimation of the new dVRK-Si system.

IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and BionicsVol. 7(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Vanderbilt University (US)
Intuitive Surgical
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.