Poverty in the Soviet Society of the Postwar Years: Sources for the Study of Economic Characteristics. The Second Half of the 1940s - 1980s.

The article is devoted to the review of the source complex on the problems of the authorities' work with poverty in the Soviet society in the second half of the 1964s-1980s. This topic is part of the study of the living standards of the population in the USSR, but none of the authors of scientific works has presented a set of sources on the problems of poverty. The authors of the article consider the phenomenon of poverty as a reflection of distributive principles, which, in turn, were a systemic indicator of the level of exploitation of workers. The review of documents includes, first of all, “secondary”, analytical sources, created as a result of the study of budget surveys, data on salaries, one-time territorial surveys on these issues by representatives of the authorities and the scientific community. The study reveals that during the post-war forty years the problem of poverty and poverty alleviation was constantly in the sphere of active observation and decision-making by the governing bodies. The source review describes analytical documents on this issue, created under the auspices of the Central Statutory Administration of the USSR, as well as scientific teams of economists, sociologists and groups of political figures. The main part of the documents of the presented review was found in the fonds of the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History. These documents allow us to draw conclusions about the dynamics of the state of poverty and poverty, as well as the size of the low-income strata of the USSR and the social characteristics of this phenomenon. As the source complex testifies, poverty as a phenomenon that existed widely in the post-war period was generally eliminated by the mid-1950s. Low-income groups of the population were also decreasing. In 1960, the population group receiving the lowest level of wages (up to 35 rubles per month) accounted for about half of all families. In the mid-1960s the minimum wage level was raised and in the 1970s this group did not exceed a tenth of families. People's self-perception generally coincided with these figures: according to sociological surveys in the mid-1980s, about 11% of the country's population called themselves “poor” (“living from paycheck to paycheck”). The social groups included in the category of “poor and low-income” were, as a rule, collective farmers, representatives of health care, housing and communal services, and trade. The analytical documents named a large number of dependents in the family, low wages in certain branches of production as factors of poverty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of an Archivist
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2025-2-542-559
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poverty in the Soviet Society of the Postwar Years: Sources for the Study of Economic Characteristics. The Second Half of the 1940s - 1980s.

Tatiana M. Dimoni, Mikhail Beznin
Herald of an Archivist
Russia and Soviet political economy
article

Poverty in the Soviet Society of the Postwar Years: Sources for the Study of Economic Characteristics. The Second Half of the 1940s - 1980s.

Tatiana M. Dimoni, Mikhail Beznin
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the review of the source complex on the problems of the authorities' work with poverty in the Soviet society in the second half of the 1964s-1980s. This topic is part of the study of the living standards of the population in the USSR, but none of the authors of scientific works has presented a set of sources on the problems of poverty. The authors of the article consider the phenomenon of poverty as a reflection of distributive principles, which, in turn, were a systemic indicator of the level of exploitation of workers. The review of documents includes, first of all, “secondary”, analytical sources, created as a result of the study of budget surveys, data on salaries, one-time territorial surveys on these issues by representatives of the authorities and the scientific community. The study reveals that during the post-war forty years the problem of poverty and poverty alleviation was constantly in the sphere of active observation and decision-making by the governing bodies. The source review describes analytical documents on this issue, created under the auspices of the Central Statutory Administration of the USSR, as well as scientific teams of economists, sociologists and groups of political figures. The main part of the documents of the presented review was found in the fonds of the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History. These documents allow us to draw conclusions about the dynamics of the state of poverty and poverty, as well as the size of the low-income strata of the USSR and the social characteristics of this phenomenon. As the source complex testifies, poverty as a phenomenon that existed widely in the post-war period was generally eliminated by the mid-1950s. Low-income groups of the population were also decreasing. In 1960, the population group receiving the lowest level of wages (up to 35 rubles per month) accounted for about half of all families. In the mid-1960s the minimum wage level was raised and in the 1970s this group did not exceed a tenth of families. People's self-perception generally coincided with these figures: according to sociological surveys in the mid-1980s, about 11% of the country's population called themselves “poor” (“living from paycheck to paycheck”). The social groups included in the category of “poor and low-income” were, as a rule, collective farmers, representatives of health care, housing and communal services, and trade. The analytical documents named a large number of dependents in the family, low wages in certain branches of production as factors of poverty.

Herald of an Archivist(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Russia and Soviet political economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.