Peasant sentiments on the materials of “Lenin's Week” on the first anniversary of the death of V. I. Lenin. 1925

The article analyzes the materials of the “Lenin Week” of 1925, stored in the State Archive of Contemporary History of the Smolensk region. These are mainly “reports” on the holding of “Lenin's Week” on the territory of Smolensk province. The value of this kind of source lies in their primary character and weak processing - they are first-hand materials. When studying the materials of “reports”, one should take into account the property of public opinion, which is characterized by a discrepancy between verbal and real behavior. People do not always act as they say. It is noted that in the post-Soviet period the interest of researchers in studying the moods, perceptions and perceptions of events both inside the country and abroad has significantly increased. The opportunity to work with materials previously hidden from researchers allows us to clarify and sometimes even change our perceptions of the past. This applies to the person of the early Soviet period, who was often perceived as a “cog” in the huge Soviet mechanism. Familiarity with the materials reflecting public sentiment shows that there are a large number of people capable of critical thinking, who do not succumb to the propaganda tricks of the authorities, who, using a variety of reasons, methodically exerted pressure on the consciousness of the population. One such occasion was the death of Lenin and the subsequent mourning events. The first anniversary of Lenin's death was used by the authorities to broadcast to the population the necessary not only domestic but also foreign policy images. The holding of the “Lenin Week” was intended to shape the experience of the collective identity of the Soviet person. The author concludes that the “reports” on the events planned by the authorities show a very different spectrum of public sentiments of the Smolensk peasantry: from agreement with the position of the authorities on the achievements in building a new society, to the expression of a negative attitude towards it. In the latter case, the informants attributed such sentiments to the anti-Soviet kulachchestvo and, in general, to elements alien to Soviet power. A study of peasant sentiment in Smolensk province showed that the results of Lenin's Week were not quite what the authorities had hoped for. Despite the informants' assurances about the growth of political activity of the peasantry, the political passivity of the population was most often noted. The peasants were more interested in the most pressing problems related to their daily life: whether it concerned international events or the fate of L. D. Trotsky, everything “revolved” around their vital interests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of an Archivist
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2025-2-512-523
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peasant sentiments on the materials of “Lenin's Week” on the first anniversary of the death of V. I. Lenin. 1925

Mikhail V. Bryantsev
Herald of an Archivist
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Peasant sentiments on the materials of “Lenin's Week” on the first anniversary of the death of V. I. Lenin. 1925

Mikhail V. Bryantsev
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the materials of the “Lenin Week” of 1925, stored in the State Archive of Contemporary History of the Smolensk region. These are mainly “reports” on the holding of “Lenin's Week” on the territory of Smolensk province. The value of this kind of source lies in their primary character and weak processing - they are first-hand materials. When studying the materials of “reports”, one should take into account the property of public opinion, which is characterized by a discrepancy between verbal and real behavior. People do not always act as they say. It is noted that in the post-Soviet period the interest of researchers in studying the moods, perceptions and perceptions of events both inside the country and abroad has significantly increased. The opportunity to work with materials previously hidden from researchers allows us to clarify and sometimes even change our perceptions of the past. This applies to the person of the early Soviet period, who was often perceived as a “cog” in the huge Soviet mechanism. Familiarity with the materials reflecting public sentiment shows that there are a large number of people capable of critical thinking, who do not succumb to the propaganda tricks of the authorities, who, using a variety of reasons, methodically exerted pressure on the consciousness of the population. One such occasion was the death of Lenin and the subsequent mourning events. The first anniversary of Lenin's death was used by the authorities to broadcast to the population the necessary not only domestic but also foreign policy images. The holding of the “Lenin Week” was intended to shape the experience of the collective identity of the Soviet person. The author concludes that the “reports” on the events planned by the authorities show a very different spectrum of public sentiments of the Smolensk peasantry: from agreement with the position of the authorities on the achievements in building a new society, to the expression of a negative attitude towards it. In the latter case, the informants attributed such sentiments to the anti-Soviet kulachchestvo and, in general, to elements alien to Soviet power. A study of peasant sentiment in Smolensk province showed that the results of Lenin's Week were not quite what the authorities had hoped for. Despite the informants' assurances about the growth of political activity of the peasantry, the political passivity of the population was most often noted. The peasants were more interested in the most pressing problems related to their daily life: whether it concerned international events or the fate of L. D. Trotsky, everything “revolved” around their vital interests.

Herald of an Archivist(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.