PFAS Remediation by Commercially Available Pulsed Plasma Technology

Technologies that destructively remove per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from aqueous matrices are likely to be required for efficient and cost-effective PFAS remediation strategies. In this study, the commercially available Roxia Plasma Oxidizer (RPO) technology was evaluated for the treatment of PFAS-containing water. This technology uses pulsed corona discharge (PCD) in a gas medium to treat water droplets in direct plasma contact in the discharge zone. Process conditions, including gas composition, discharge polarity, temperature, droplet source, and pulse frequency, were tuned to improve PFAS removal efficiency. A diffusion-based process model was developed to interpret the experimental results. For long-chain PFAS (here, PFOS, PFOA), the energy efficiency of removal for this technology was measured to be 20–24 kWh/m3, which is comparable with other plasma-based PFAS remediation technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01115
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PFAS Remediation by Commercially Available Pulsed Plasma Technology

Hattie L. Ring, Iakov Kornev, David Buckley, Petri Ajo et al.
4 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
5.44
article

PFAS Remediation by Commercially Available Pulsed Plasma Technology

Hattie L. Ring, Iakov Kornev, David Buckley, Petri Ajo, Stephen A. O. Olson, Katharine Hunter, Neeraj S. Borker, Stephen M. McNamara, Henry Hatakka, Zhuonan Liu, Pyry Kupias, Simo Manninen, Grant D. Frost
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Technologies that destructively remove per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from aqueous matrices are likely to be required for efficient and cost-effective PFAS remediation strategies. In this study, the commercially available Roxia Plasma Oxidizer (RPO) technology was evaluated for the treatment of PFAS-containing water. This technology uses pulsed corona discharge (PCD) in a gas medium to treat water droplets in direct plasma contact in the discharge zone. Process conditions, including gas composition, discharge polarity, temperature, droplet source, and pulse frequency, were tuned to improve PFAS removal efficiency. A diffusion-based process model was developed to interpret the experimental results. For long-chain PFAS (here, PFOS, PFOA), the energy efficiency of removal for this technology was measured to be 20–24 kWh/m3, which is comparable with other plasma-based PFAS remediation technologies.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(8)
3M (United States) (US), Plasma Technology (United States) (US), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
3M
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
5.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PFAS Remediation by Commercially Available Pulsed Plasma Technology — Hattie L. Ring, Iakov Kornev, et al. · ACS ES&T Water (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS