Mining Work Health, Safety Laws and Serious Industrial Crimes in Australia: Down the Shaft of Jurisdictional Inconsistency
This article examines the level of inconsistency in work, health and safety (WHS) laws across Australia’s mining sector. Despite general efforts towards national harmonisation through model WHS legislation, significant inconsistencies persist because individual states and territories retain primary regulatory control. A critical analysis of each jurisdiction’s legislative framework reveals a fragmented legal landscape. Queensland, especially, exhibits notable divergence. Key findings highlight a considerable variation in legislative approaches to risk management principles and specific obligations. In particular, a disjointed and incremental approach to serious offences such as industrial manslaughter and provisions concerning imputed conduct are evident. These inconsistencies suggest that corporations operating in multiple Australian mining regions must develop a nuanced understanding of the varying WHS requirements in each jurisdiction. This study underscores the need for caution when assessing risk management strategies aimed at preventing serious incidents because the presumption of a harmonised system can be misleading, especially concerning mining-specific legislation.
Authors
- Trajce Cvetkovski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-4476)
- Neville Weston
Institutions
- City Eye Centre (AU)
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Laws
- Published
- 2025-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040049
- Primary Topic
- Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00