Hindcasting Extreme Significant Wave Heights Under Fetch-Limited Conditions with Tree-Based Models

Accurately hindcasting waves in semi-enclosed, fetch-limited basins remains challenging for reanalysis models, which tend to underestimate storm peaks near the coast. We developed interpretable ML models for Rijeka Bay (northern Adriatic) using only wind observations from two land-based wind stations to predict buoy Hm0 measurements spanning 2009–2011 (testing) and 2019–2021 (training and validation). The tested tree-based models included Random Forest, XGBoost, and Explainable Boosting Machine. This study introduces a novel approach in the literature by employing weighted schemes and feature engineering to enhance the predictive performance of interpretable, low-complexity machine learning models in hindcasting waves. Representing wind direction as sine–cosine components generally reduced RMSE and BIAS relative to traditional speed–direction inputs, while an exponential sample weight scheme that emphasized storm waves halved extreme Hm0 underprediction without inflating overall RMSE. The best-performing model, a Random Forest model, achieved an RMSE of 0.096 m and a correlation of 0.855 on the unseen test set—30% lower overall RMSE and 50% lower extreme wave RMSE than the MEDSEA and COEXMED hindcasts. Additionally, the underprediction was reduced by 90% compared to these reanalysis models. The method offers a computationally lightweight, transferable supplement to numerical wave guidance for coastal engineering and harbor operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071355
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hindcasting Extreme Significant Wave Heights Under Fetch-Limited Conditions with Tree-Based Models

Damjan Bujak, Hanna Miličević, Dalibor Carević, Goran Lončar
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
article

Hindcasting Extreme Significant Wave Heights Under Fetch-Limited Conditions with Tree-Based Models

Damjan Bujak, Hanna Miličević, Dalibor Carević, Goran Lončar
article en

Abstract

Accurately hindcasting waves in semi-enclosed, fetch-limited basins remains challenging for reanalysis models, which tend to underestimate storm peaks near the coast. We developed interpretable ML models for Rijeka Bay (northern Adriatic) using only wind observations from two land-based wind stations to predict buoy Hm0 measurements spanning 2009–2011 (testing) and 2019–2021 (training and validation). The tested tree-based models included Random Forest, XGBoost, and Explainable Boosting Machine. This study introduces a novel approach in the literature by employing weighted schemes and feature engineering to enhance the predictive performance of interpretable, low-complexity machine learning models in hindcasting waves. Representing wind direction as sine–cosine components generally reduced RMSE and BIAS relative to traditional speed–direction inputs, while an exponential sample weight scheme that emphasized storm waves halved extreme Hm0 underprediction without inflating overall RMSE. The best-performing model, a Random Forest model, achieved an RMSE of 0.096 m and a correlation of 0.855 on the unseen test set—30% lower overall RMSE and 50% lower extreme wave RMSE than the MEDSEA and COEXMED hindcasts. Additionally, the underprediction was reduced by 90% compared to these reanalysis models. The method offers a computationally lightweight, transferable supplement to numerical wave guidance for coastal engineering and harbor operations.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(7)
University of Zagreb (HR)
Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.