Fully Digital Workflow in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Methodological Review

Background. Digital dentistry continues to evolve, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and patient experience across various prosthodontic procedures. Many previous reviews have focused on digital applications in prosthodontics. But the use of a fully digital workflow for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in edentulous patients remains an emerging and underexplored area in the literature. Objective. This article presents a comprehensive methodological review of the digital workflow in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation. It follows a structured literature exploration and synthesizes relevant technological processes from patient assessment to prosthetic delivery. Methods. The relevant literature was retrieved from the PubMed database on 20 June 2024, to identify the most recent and relevant studies. A total of 22 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The majority included case and technical reports. Results. The review illustrates the integration and application of digital tools in implant dentistry, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exposure, intraoral scanning, digital smile design, virtual patients, guided surgery, and digital scanning. The key findings demonstrate multiple advantages of a fully digital workflow, such as reduced treatment time and cost, increased patient satisfaction, and improved interdisciplinary communication. Conclusions. Despite these benefits, limitations persist due to the low level of evidence, technological challenges, and the lack of standardized protocols. Further randomized controlled trials and long-term clinical evaluations are essential to validate the effectiveness and feasibility of a fully digital workflow for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prosthesis
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7040085
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fully Digital Workflow in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Methodological Review

Nada El Osta, Chantal Auduc, Emmanuel Nicolas, Thomas Douillard
8 citations
Prosthesis
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
14.32
article

Fully Digital Workflow in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Methodological Review

Nada El Osta, Chantal Auduc, Emmanuel Nicolas, Thomas Douillard
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Background. Digital dentistry continues to evolve, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and patient experience across various prosthodontic procedures. Many previous reviews have focused on digital applications in prosthodontics. But the use of a fully digital workflow for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in edentulous patients remains an emerging and underexplored area in the literature. Objective. This article presents a comprehensive methodological review of the digital workflow in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation. It follows a structured literature exploration and synthesizes relevant technological processes from patient assessment to prosthetic delivery. Methods. The relevant literature was retrieved from the PubMed database on 20 June 2024, to identify the most recent and relevant studies. A total of 22 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The majority included case and technical reports. Results. The review illustrates the integration and application of digital tools in implant dentistry, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exposure, intraoral scanning, digital smile design, virtual patients, guided surgery, and digital scanning. The key findings demonstrate multiple advantages of a fully digital workflow, such as reduced treatment time and cost, increased patient satisfaction, and improved interdisciplinary communication. Conclusions. Despite these benefits, limitations persist due to the low level of evidence, technological challenges, and the lack of standardized protocols. Further randomized controlled trials and long-term clinical evaluations are essential to validate the effectiveness and feasibility of a fully digital workflow for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation.

ProsthesisVol. 7(4)
University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Clermont Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
14.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.