Hybrid Warfare, Grey Zone Conflicts, and the Battle of Narratives: Discourse as a Strategic Weapon

This paper explores the changing nature of warfare in the current environment, which has brought into focus the nature of hybrid warfare and the grey zone of military conflict, including the central role that discourse and narrative play as strategic weapons. Conventional war has changed, state and non-state adversaries are employing Information operations, influence warfare and media control to achieve strategic end states without the use of force of arms. This investigation is based on a qualitative research design with the critical discourse analysis (CDA), and strategic communication theories providing the overall framework for how stories create views, change attitudes and, perhaps, even realign hard geopolitical circumstances. The paper integrates theories from international relations, as well as media and military strategy, to examine case studies such as Russian activities in Ukraine, Chinese influence in Asia and ISIS propaganda. The results illustrate the growing importance of narrative supremacy in current conflict and suggest countermeasures to democratic resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Prism
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69671/socialprism.2.2.2025.37
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Warfare, Grey Zone Conflicts, and the Battle of Narratives: Discourse as a Strategic Weapon

Mohsin Malik, Mohammad Saleem, Alizeh Khakwani
Social Prism
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Hybrid Warfare, Grey Zone Conflicts, and the Battle of Narratives: Discourse as a Strategic Weapon

Mohsin Malik, Mohammad Saleem, Alizeh Khakwani
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the changing nature of warfare in the current environment, which has brought into focus the nature of hybrid warfare and the grey zone of military conflict, including the central role that discourse and narrative play as strategic weapons. Conventional war has changed, state and non-state adversaries are employing Information operations, influence warfare and media control to achieve strategic end states without the use of force of arms. This investigation is based on a qualitative research design with the critical discourse analysis (CDA), and strategic communication theories providing the overall framework for how stories create views, change attitudes and, perhaps, even realign hard geopolitical circumstances. The paper integrates theories from international relations, as well as media and military strategy, to examine case studies such as Russian activities in Ukraine, Chinese influence in Asia and ISIS propaganda. The results illustrate the growing importance of narrative supremacy in current conflict and suggest countermeasures to democratic resilience.

Social PrismVol. 2(2)
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), Bloomfield College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid Warfare, Grey Zone Conflicts, and the Battle of Narratives: Discourse as a Strategic Weapon — Mohsin Malik, Mohammad Saleem, et al. · Social Prism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS