Evaluation of digital PCR for the detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus in persistently infected cattle

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) is a significant pathogen of cattle, causing substantial economic losses. Identifying persistently infected (PI) animals is crucial for BVD control and prevention, with pooled ear-notch tissue testing being a standard screening method. Digital PCR (dPCR) is an emerging diagnostic tool that provides absolute quantification of animal pathogens in low abundant targets. This study evaluates the effectiveness of dPCR for BVD surveillance using field submissions of pooled ear-notch samples, comparing it to real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The study compared performance using 107 pools of ear notches (4853 sample animals), including 76 BVD-positive pools (3543 sample animals) and 31 BVD-negative pools (1310 sample animals). Pools included those that contained PI animals detected by IHC (n = 25) and those with only virus detection that were negative by IHC (n = 51). Performance metrics evaluated included analytical and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, limit of detection (LOD) and test agreement with qRT-PCR. Results showed that dPCR exhibited enhanced sensitivity and lower LOD compared to qRT-PCR, detecting as low as 0.6 viral copies/μL. dPCR achieved 100 % sensitivity (76/76) and 96.77 % specificity (30/31) compared to qRT-PCR and no detection of common bovine pathogens. The comparison between qRT-PCR and dPCR using Cohen's kappa coefficient in pooled samples was 0.98, indicating almost perfect agreement. In pooled ear-notch samples with qRT-PCR quantification cycle (Cq) values ranging from 30 to 33.99, the viral load ranged from 4.75 to 194.78 viral copies/μL. The study suggests that dPCR is a sensitive and specific method for detecting BVD in pooled ear-notches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107198
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of digital PCR for the detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus in persistently infected cattle

Enakshy Dutta, John Dustin Loy, Zachary Brown, Duan S. Loy
2 citations
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
3.81
article

Evaluation of digital PCR for the detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus in persistently infected cattle

Enakshy Dutta, John Dustin Loy, Zachary Brown, Duan S. Loy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) is a significant pathogen of cattle, causing substantial economic losses. Identifying persistently infected (PI) animals is crucial for BVD control and prevention, with pooled ear-notch tissue testing being a standard screening method. Digital PCR (dPCR) is an emerging diagnostic tool that provides absolute quantification of animal pathogens in low abundant targets. This study evaluates the effectiveness of dPCR for BVD surveillance using field submissions of pooled ear-notch samples, comparing it to real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The study compared performance using 107 pools of ear notches (4853 sample animals), including 76 BVD-positive pools (3543 sample animals) and 31 BVD-negative pools (1310 sample animals). Pools included those that contained PI animals detected by IHC (n = 25) and those with only virus detection that were negative by IHC (n = 51). Performance metrics evaluated included analytical and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, limit of detection (LOD) and test agreement with qRT-PCR. Results showed that dPCR exhibited enhanced sensitivity and lower LOD compared to qRT-PCR, detecting as low as 0.6 viral copies/μL. dPCR achieved 100 % sensitivity (76/76) and 96.77 % specificity (30/31) compared to qRT-PCR and no detection of common bovine pathogens. The comparison between qRT-PCR and dPCR using Cohen's kappa coefficient in pooled samples was 0.98, indicating almost perfect agreement. In pooled ear-notch samples with qRT-PCR quantification cycle (Cq) values ranging from 30 to 33.99, the viral load ranged from 4.75 to 194.78 viral copies/μL. The study suggests that dPCR is a sensitive and specific method for detecting BVD in pooled ear-notches.

Journal of Microbiological MethodsVol. 236
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.