Agonist-antagonist muscular co-contraction improves rapid corrective responses

Muscular co-contraction (simultaneous activation of both agonist and antagonist muscle groups) has been observed to emerge across a range of challenging tasks. But is it beneficial? In this study we address this untested assumption by quantifying the performance benefits of muscular co-contraction when making rapid corrective responses to mechanical perturbations. Even small levels of co-contraction resulted in significant performance improvements compared to the relaxed condition in a target recapture task following a mechanical perturbation. Performance was also better when co-contracting compared to when a single muscle group was active prior to the perturbation. The performance benefits of co-contracting seem partially attributable to neural mechanisms where activation of both agonist and antagonist muscles allowed both groups to contribute to limb control via reflex responses. These findings highlight how co-contraction can greatly impact motor performance. Further, the benefit of co-contraction extends beyond just increased muscle activity providing instantaneous resistance to limb motion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agonist-antagonist muscular co-contraction improves rapid corrective responses

Stephen H. Scott, Kevin J. Deluzio, Daniel P. Armstrong
1 citations
iScience
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
1.39
article

Agonist-antagonist muscular co-contraction improves rapid corrective responses

Stephen H. Scott, Kevin J. Deluzio, Daniel P. Armstrong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Muscular co-contraction (simultaneous activation of both agonist and antagonist muscle groups) has been observed to emerge across a range of challenging tasks. But is it beneficial? In this study we address this untested assumption by quantifying the performance benefits of muscular co-contraction when making rapid corrective responses to mechanical perturbations. Even small levels of co-contraction resulted in significant performance improvements compared to the relaxed condition in a target recapture task following a mechanical perturbation. Performance was also better when co-contracting compared to when a single muscle group was active prior to the perturbation. The performance benefits of co-contracting seem partially attributable to neural mechanisms where activation of both agonist and antagonist muscles allowed both groups to contribute to limb control via reflex responses. These findings highlight how co-contraction can greatly impact motor performance. Further, the benefit of co-contraction extends beyond just increased muscle activity providing instantaneous resistance to limb motion.

iScienceVol. 28(8)
Queen's University (CA)
Queen's University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Agonist-antagonist muscular co-contraction improves rapid corrective responses — Stephen H. Scott, Kevin J. Deluzio, et al. · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS