Using System Thinking to Identify Food Wastage (FW) Leverage Points in Four Different Food Chains

About one third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, leading to societal, economic and environmental challenges. This study identifies the most important food wastage (FW) leverage points and their interrelations with specific food chains. Semi-structured interviews were conducted across four different food chains (milk, poultry, potatoes and greenhouse-grown fruit and vegetables) from primary production to food service. The outcomes of the interviews were summarized via a systems approach and validated during co-creation sessions. A total of twenty-two FW leverage points were identified across the food chains, consisting of four major hotspots, six patterns of behaviours, six structures and six mental models. Common transformative leverage points across all food chains were damaged products, oversupply, regulations and standards that limit product use and a lack of prioritization of FW reduction. Additionally, this study found that co-creation sessions with stakeholders from across the food chains could facilitate the formation of coalitions of willing companies, encouraging collaborative efforts to reduce FW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146523
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using System Thinking to Identify Food Wastage (FW) Leverage Points in Four Different Food Chains

Antien Zuidberg, Woody Maijers, Frederike Praasterink, Evelot Westerink-Duijzer et al.
Sustainability
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Using System Thinking to Identify Food Wastage (FW) Leverage Points in Four Different Food Chains

Antien Zuidberg, Woody Maijers, Frederike Praasterink, Evelot Westerink-Duijzer, Ayella Spaapen, Annelies Verspeek-van der Stelt
article en

Abstract

About one third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, leading to societal, economic and environmental challenges. This study identifies the most important food wastage (FW) leverage points and their interrelations with specific food chains. Semi-structured interviews were conducted across four different food chains (milk, poultry, potatoes and greenhouse-grown fruit and vegetables) from primary production to food service. The outcomes of the interviews were summarized via a systems approach and validated during co-creation sessions. A total of twenty-two FW leverage points were identified across the food chains, consisting of four major hotspots, six patterns of behaviours, six structures and six mental models. Common transformative leverage points across all food chains were damaged products, oversupply, regulations and standards that limit product use and a lack of prioritization of FW reduction. Additionally, this study found that co-creation sessions with stakeholders from across the food chains could facilitate the formation of coalitions of willing companies, encouraging collaborative efforts to reduce FW.

SustainabilityVol. 17(14)
HZ University of Applied Sciences (NL), HAS green academy (NL), Aeres University of Applied Sciences (NL), Inholland University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using System Thinking to Identify Food Wastage (FW) Leverage Points in Four Different Food Chains — Antien Zuidberg, Woody Maijers, et al. · Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS