An organizational capacity self-assessment for innovation support service providers (OCATI) – approach and results from application in Madagascar

Purpose: This paper introduces the Organisational Capacity Assessment Approach for Innovation Support (OCATI) and presents findings from its application with a farmer-based organisation in Madagascar. Design/method/approach: OCATI has been co-designed within the EU–Africa collaborative research project SERVInnov, reflecting conditions in the global South, particularly Madagascar, Cameroon, and Burkina Faso. It assesses organisational, technical, and functional capacities, skill needs, and structural conditions for delivering innovation support services (ISS). Findings: Results from its application in Madagascar, show disparities in performance across five capacity components with the highest performance in delivering ISS and the weakest in networking and policy engagement. Recommendations include initiating policy lobbying, institutionalisation, updating knowledge of the innovation ecosystem, new collaborations, ISS mapping tools, and clear communication channels. More so, enhancements in risk management, service diversification, human resource expansion, and ISS-type awareness are equally seen as crucial. Theoretical implications: Realising an OCATI assessment fosters organisational evolution, complements widely used monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools, and supports experiential learning approaches for extension and advisory service (EAS) organisations. Practical implications: Practically, the results provide an opportunity for reflexive thinking about organisations' own position in supporting innovation, raising awareness for ISS, and revealing how support for innovation processes in agriculture matters and can be enhanced. The approach help organisations extract and develop core competencies in innovation support, thereby becoming more professionalised and recognised. Original Value: This study addresses a significant research gap in organisational capacity assessment for innovation support and introduces a novel self-assessment tool for use by innovation support service providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2025.2519069
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An organizational capacity self-assessment for innovation support service providers (OCATI) – approach and results from application in Madagascar

Syndhia Mathé, Andrea Knierim, Ousmane Traoré, Aurélie Toillier et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Public-Private Partnership Projects
2.23
article

An organizational capacity self-assessment for innovation support service providers (OCATI) – approach and results from application in Madagascar

Syndhia Mathé, Andrea Knierim, Ousmane Traoré, Aurélie Toillier, Hycenth Tim Ndah, Sarah Crestin-Billet, Narilala Randrianarison, Sarah Audouin, Guillaume Fongang, Nestor Ngouambé
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This paper introduces the Organisational Capacity Assessment Approach for Innovation Support (OCATI) and presents findings from its application with a farmer-based organisation in Madagascar. Design/method/approach: OCATI has been co-designed within the EU–Africa collaborative research project SERVInnov, reflecting conditions in the global South, particularly Madagascar, Cameroon, and Burkina Faso. It assesses organisational, technical, and functional capacities, skill needs, and structural conditions for delivering innovation support services (ISS). Findings: Results from its application in Madagascar, show disparities in performance across five capacity components with the highest performance in delivering ISS and the weakest in networking and policy engagement. Recommendations include initiating policy lobbying, institutionalisation, updating knowledge of the innovation ecosystem, new collaborations, ISS mapping tools, and clear communication channels. More so, enhancements in risk management, service diversification, human resource expansion, and ISS-type awareness are equally seen as crucial. Theoretical implications: Realising an OCATI assessment fosters organisational evolution, complements widely used monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools, and supports experiential learning approaches for extension and advisory service (EAS) organisations. Practical implications: Practically, the results provide an opportunity for reflexive thinking about organisations' own position in supporting innovation, raising awareness for ISS, and revealing how support for innovation processes in agriculture matters and can be enhanced. The approach help organisations extract and develop core competencies in innovation support, thereby becoming more professionalised and recognised. Original Value: This study addresses a significant research gap in organisational capacity assessment for innovation support and introduces a novel self-assessment tool for use by innovation support service providers.

The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
University of Hohenheim (DE), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo (BF), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), University of Antananarivo (MG), Université de Dschang (CM), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), UniMAC-GIJ (GH), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), African Forum for Agricultural Advisory Services (UG), Nigerian University Games Association (NG), Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural (MG), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.