Freedom and the Ethics of Plant-Based Diets in University Food Services

Abstract A number of universities have implemented policies to increase the proportion of plant-based items offered by their food services as part of efforts to promote environmental sustainability and health. This article explores student freedom as an ethical issue in this context. Our central claim is that, while freedom is indeed an important ethical concern for university plant-based food initiatives, these efforts can avoid unjustifiably interfering with freedom if certain conditions are met. We suggest four criteria: (1) public messaging surrounding dietary choices should avoid stigmatizing meat-eating, (2) menus should retain some animal-source foods and ensure that plant-based substitutes included nutritionally fortified and whole food options, (3) the aggressiveness of the transition should be calibrated to student support, and (4) plant-based menu items should be appealing on their own terms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Ethics
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-025-00176-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom and the Ethics of Plant-Based Diets in University Food Services

C. Tyler DesRoches, Charly Phillips, Kian Mintz‐Woo, Daniel Steel et al.
1 citations
Food Ethics
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Freedom and the Ethics of Plant-Based Diets in University Food Services

C. Tyler DesRoches, Charly Phillips, Kian Mintz‐Woo, Daniel Steel, Brynmor Crookall
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A number of universities have implemented policies to increase the proportion of plant-based items offered by their food services as part of efforts to promote environmental sustainability and health. This article explores student freedom as an ethical issue in this context. Our central claim is that, while freedom is indeed an important ethical concern for university plant-based food initiatives, these efforts can avoid unjustifiably interfering with freedom if certain conditions are met. We suggest four criteria: (1) public messaging surrounding dietary choices should avoid stigmatizing meat-eating, (2) menus should retain some animal-source foods and ensure that plant-based substitutes included nutritionally fortified and whole food options, (3) the aggressiveness of the transition should be calibrated to student support, and (4) plant-based menu items should be appealing on their own terms.

Food EthicsVol. 10(2)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), University of British Columbia (CA), University College Cork (IE), Arizona State University (US)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freedom and the Ethics of Plant-Based Diets in University Food Services — C. Tyler DesRoches, Charly Phillips, et al. · Food Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS