The Implications of Clientelism for Reintegration and Family Strengthening

This study examines the impact of clientelism on reintegration and family-strengthening efforts for children in Cambodian and Myanmar residential care institutions where clientelism is present. It finds that patron–client relationships between directors and families often undermine reintegration by limiting parental agency and co-opting reintegration to serve the interests of directors rather than children. While some directors use their influence as patrons to support reintegration, such instances are rare. More commonly, clientelist dynamics obstruct reunification and restrict access to family-strengthening services. The findings call for adaptations to case management and family assessments to address these dynamics, and for expanded family-strengthening services that consider families’ long-term aspirations otherwise facilitated through clientelism. These interim measures must be paired with broader social welfare reforms and equitable access to public services to reduce families’ reliance on clientelism. A blended approach that simultaneously engages and curtails clientelism may offer a pragmatic pathway towards strengthening rights-based care and protection systems for vulnerable children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23493003251356871
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implications of Clientelism for Reintegration and Family Strengthening

Rebecca Nhep
Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

The Implications of Clientelism for Reintegration and Family Strengthening

Rebecca Nhep
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of clientelism on reintegration and family-strengthening efforts for children in Cambodian and Myanmar residential care institutions where clientelism is present. It finds that patron–client relationships between directors and families often undermine reintegration by limiting parental agency and co-opting reintegration to serve the interests of directors rather than children. While some directors use their influence as patrons to support reintegration, such instances are rare. More commonly, clientelist dynamics obstruct reunification and restrict access to family-strengthening services. The findings call for adaptations to case management and family assessments to address these dynamics, and for expanded family-strengthening services that consider families’ long-term aspirations otherwise facilitated through clientelism. These interim measures must be paired with broader social welfare reforms and equitable access to public services to reduce families’ reliance on clientelism. A blended approach that simultaneously engages and curtails clientelism may offer a pragmatic pathway towards strengthening rights-based care and protection systems for vulnerable children.

Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Implications of Clientelism for Reintegration and Family Strengthening — Rebecca Nhep · Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS