Predicate abstraction for hyperliveness verification

Temporal hyperproperties are system properties that relate multiple execution traces. In finite-state systems, temporal hyperproperties are supported by model-checking algorithms, and tools for general temporal logics like HyperLTL exist. In infinite-state systems, the analysis of temporal hyperproperties has, so far, been limited to <i>k</i>-safety properties, i.e., properties that stipulate the absence of a bad interaction between any <i>k</i> traces. In this paper, we present an automated method for the verification of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup> <mml:msup><mml:mo>∃</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -safety properties in infinite-state systems. A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup> <mml:msup><mml:mo>∃</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -safety property stipulates that for any <i>k</i> traces, there exist <i>l</i> traces such that the resulting <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> traces do not interact badly. This combination of universal and existential quantification captures many properties beyond <i>k</i>-safety, including hyperliveness properties such as generalized non-interference or program refinement. Our verification method is based on a strategy-based instantiation of existential trace quantification combined with a program reduction, both in the context of a fixed predicate abstraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formal Methods in System Design
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-025-00482-5
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicate abstraction for hyperliveness verification

Bernd Finkbeiner, Raven Beutner
Formal Methods in System Design
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Predicate abstraction for hyperliveness verification

Bernd Finkbeiner, Raven Beutner
article en

Abstract

Temporal hyperproperties are system properties that relate multiple execution traces. In finite-state systems, temporal hyperproperties are supported by model-checking algorithms, and tools for general temporal logics like HyperLTL exist. In infinite-state systems, the analysis of temporal hyperproperties has, so far, been limited to <i>k</i>-safety properties, i.e., properties that stipulate the absence of a bad interaction between any <i>k</i> traces. In this paper, we present an automated method for the verification of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup> <mml:msup><mml:mo>∃</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -safety properties in infinite-state systems. A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup> <mml:msup><mml:mo>∃</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -safety property stipulates that for any <i>k</i> traces, there exist <i>l</i> traces such that the resulting <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:math> traces do not interact badly. This combination of universal and existential quantification captures many properties beyond <i>k</i>-safety, including hyperliveness properties such as generalized non-interference or program refinement. Our verification method is based on a strategy-based instantiation of existential trace quantification combined with a program reduction, both in the context of a fixed predicate abstraction.

Formal Methods in System DesignVol. 66(2)
Helmholtz Center for Information Security (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.