Effectiveness of Additional Preventive Measures for Pressure Injury Prevention in an Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pressure injuries (PIs), a recognized indicator of care quality, have a higher incidence in intensive care units (ICUs). Our objective was to assess whether critically ill patients identified as "unprotected" (COMHON ≥ 11) developed pressure injuries despite additional preventive measures. <b>Methods:</b> A historical cohort study of an adult ICU was carried out. Of the 811 patients admitted in 2022, 400 were selected. All of them were subjected to the ICU's PI Prevention Protocol, and those with a moving average of the COMHON Index ≥ 11 were given two additional measures: a multilayer dressing on the sacrum, and anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots. <b>Results:</b> A total of 36 patients presented with PIs (cumulative incidence of 9%). Significant differences were observed in their mean length of stay and in their disease severity score (APACHE-II). Most of the PIs were located on the sacrum, followed by the heel. Prior to the appearance of the PIs, a sacral dressing was applied to 100% of the patients, while anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots were only applied to 58.3%. Of the 36 patients with PIs, 52.8% had a PI on the sacrum and 22.2% on the heel. <b>Conclusions:</b> Focusing only on those who presented with PIs, we observed that the considered measures were not effective for preventing PIs in all the patients. Not all PIs are preventable, and individual risk factors should be considered. In the future, we will analyze the individual characteristics of these patients and verify whether the Prevention Protocol was followed, in order to determine how they could have been prevented or whether they were so-called unavoidable PIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070259
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Additional Preventive Measures for Pressure Injury Prevention in an Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study

María del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, Carmen D. Chinea-Rodríguez, Carolina Martín-Meana, Alejandro Jiménez et al.
1 citations
Nursing Reports
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
article

Effectiveness of Additional Preventive Measures for Pressure Injury Prevention in an Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study

María del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, Carmen D. Chinea-Rodríguez, Carolina Martín-Meana, Alejandro Jiménez, María del Carmen Arroyo-López, Á. Arias, José Manuel González-Darias, Patricia Fariña-Martín
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pressure injuries (PIs), a recognized indicator of care quality, have a higher incidence in intensive care units (ICUs). Our objective was to assess whether critically ill patients identified as "unprotected" (COMHON ≥ 11) developed pressure injuries despite additional preventive measures. <b>Methods:</b> A historical cohort study of an adult ICU was carried out. Of the 811 patients admitted in 2022, 400 were selected. All of them were subjected to the ICU's PI Prevention Protocol, and those with a moving average of the COMHON Index ≥ 11 were given two additional measures: a multilayer dressing on the sacrum, and anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots. <b>Results:</b> A total of 36 patients presented with PIs (cumulative incidence of 9%). Significant differences were observed in their mean length of stay and in their disease severity score (APACHE-II). Most of the PIs were located on the sacrum, followed by the heel. Prior to the appearance of the PIs, a sacral dressing was applied to 100% of the patients, while anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots were only applied to 58.3%. Of the 36 patients with PIs, 52.8% had a PI on the sacrum and 22.2% on the heel. <b>Conclusions:</b> Focusing only on those who presented with PIs, we observed that the considered measures were not effective for preventing PIs in all the patients. Not all PIs are preventable, and individual risk factors should be considered. In the future, we will analyze the individual characteristics of these patients and verify whether the Prevention Protocol was followed, in order to determine how they could have been prevented or whether they were so-called unavoidable PIs.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(7)
Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.