Quantification of airborne fungal antigens by ELISA and comparison to molecular biological and classical methods

Bioaerosol detection and analysis is an ongoing field of research. Although various methodologies are used for collection and analysis, there is no single method available to close the knowledge gap between exposure and health impact. For airborne fungal material, the standard analysis method remains cultivation. With molecular technology advancing in the field, both methods can only show the exposure to living, cultivatable, or total fungal cells in the airborne environment. To close the gap between airborne concentrations and impact on the human body, recognition of the allergenic potential is necessary. Therefore, we evaluated six fungal-specific ELISAs to make them ready for application in field studies and compared them to cultivation, spore counting, and molecular genetic methods. We are confident that in the future antigen-recognizing methods like the tested ELISAs will enable moving from particle detection toward detection of the disease-causing agent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00163-25
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of airborne fungal antigens by ELISA and comparison to molecular biological and classical methods

Clara Pogner, Joseph Strauss, Monika Raulf, Ingrid Sander et al.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
article

Quantification of airborne fungal antigens by ELISA and comparison to molecular biological and classical methods

Clara Pogner, Joseph Strauss, Monika Raulf, Ingrid Sander, Markus Gorfer
article en

Abstract

Bioaerosol detection and analysis is an ongoing field of research. Although various methodologies are used for collection and analysis, there is no single method available to close the knowledge gap between exposure and health impact. For airborne fungal material, the standard analysis method remains cultivation. With molecular technology advancing in the field, both methods can only show the exposure to living, cultivatable, or total fungal cells in the airborne environment. To close the gap between airborne concentrations and impact on the human body, recognition of the allergenic potential is necessary. Therefore, we evaluated six fungal-specific ELISAs to make them ready for application in field studies and compared them to cultivation, spore counting, and molecular genetic methods. We are confident that in the future antigen-recognizing methods like the tested ELISAs will enable moving from particle detection toward detection of the disease-causing agent.

Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyVol. 91(8)
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantification of airborne fungal antigens by ELISA and comparison to molecular biological and classical methods — Clara Pogner, Joseph Strauss, et al. · Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS