The Institutional Evolution of Chinese University Data Governance: An Analytical Framework Based on Historical Institutionalism

This article examines the institutional evolution of university data governance in China through the lens of historical institutionalism, offering a novel perspective on this critical topic. This framework provides a structured approach to analyzing the role of institutional factors, power dynamics, and path dependence in shaping university data governance. Since the onset of the information age, Chinese university data governance has evolved through three distinct phases: functional departmentalism, cross-departmental collaborative governance with hierarchical structures, and governance focused on data openness and application. At a deeper level, shifts in governmental data governance serve as key indicators of transformations in university data governance, demonstrating the interplay between institutional frameworks and power structures. Path dependence is evident, with rational choices made by both the government and universities driving the persistence of existing governance models. Legitimacy emerges as the core driving force behind these institutional changes, while efficiency acts as an accelerator, contingent on legitimacy. To advance data governance, Chinese universities must break free from path dependence, reform institutional frameworks, and adapt data power structures to meet the evolving demands of data openness and effective application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Institutional Evolution of Chinese University Data Governance: An Analytical Framework Based on Historical Institutionalism

Yiming Chen, Duanhong Zhang, Bowen Song, Hong Liu et al.
1 citations
Education Sciences
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

The Institutional Evolution of Chinese University Data Governance: An Analytical Framework Based on Historical Institutionalism

Yiming Chen, Duanhong Zhang, Bowen Song, Hong Liu, Hongwei Geng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the institutional evolution of university data governance in China through the lens of historical institutionalism, offering a novel perspective on this critical topic. This framework provides a structured approach to analyzing the role of institutional factors, power dynamics, and path dependence in shaping university data governance. Since the onset of the information age, Chinese university data governance has evolved through three distinct phases: functional departmentalism, cross-departmental collaborative governance with hierarchical structures, and governance focused on data openness and application. At a deeper level, shifts in governmental data governance serve as key indicators of transformations in university data governance, demonstrating the interplay between institutional frameworks and power structures. Path dependence is evident, with rational choices made by both the government and universities driving the persistence of existing governance models. Legitimacy emerges as the core driving force behind these institutional changes, while efficiency acts as an accelerator, contingent on legitimacy. To advance data governance, Chinese universities must break free from path dependence, reform institutional frameworks, and adapt data power structures to meet the evolving demands of data openness and effective application.

Education SciencesVol. 15(7)
Tongji University (CN), Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.