Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa—Interim Results from an Ongoing, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe disorder with limited treatment efficacy. This interim analysis aimed to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing core AN symptoms, stress, depression, low self-esteem, and BMI in adolescent females, to determine the rationale for continuing the study. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 20 adolescent females with AN assigned to an active tDCS group <i>(n</i> = 10) or a sham group (<i>n</i> = 10). The intervention involved 30 sessions over three weeks, targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) for eating disorder symptoms, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) for stress, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) for self-esteem, and body mass index (BMI) measurements. Safety and tolerability were assessed using the tDCS Side Effects Questionnaire. <b>Results</b>: Eating disorder symptoms significantly decreased in the active tDCS group at study end (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.02), while no significant changes were observed in the sham group. Although BMI increased more in the active group (13.78%) than in the sham group (7.31%), this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.10). <b>Conclusions</b>: Adverse effects were mild and transient, with no serious safety concerns reported. Based on the results of this interim analysis, the study will proceed due to promising efficacy outcomes and good treatment tolerability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145040
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa—Interim Results from an Ongoing, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Maksymilian Seweryn, Natalia Kajka, Joanna Róg, Zuzanna Rząd et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa—Interim Results from an Ongoing, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Maksymilian Seweryn, Natalia Kajka, Joanna Róg, Zuzanna Rząd, Hanna Karakuła‐Juchnowicz, Jakub Patyk
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe disorder with limited treatment efficacy. This interim analysis aimed to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing core AN symptoms, stress, depression, low self-esteem, and BMI in adolescent females, to determine the rationale for continuing the study. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 20 adolescent females with AN assigned to an active tDCS group <i>(n</i> = 10) or a sham group (<i>n</i> = 10). The intervention involved 30 sessions over three weeks, targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) for eating disorder symptoms, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) for stress, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) for self-esteem, and body mass index (BMI) measurements. Safety and tolerability were assessed using the tDCS Side Effects Questionnaire. <b>Results</b>: Eating disorder symptoms significantly decreased in the active tDCS group at study end (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.02), while no significant changes were observed in the sham group. Although BMI increased more in the active group (13.78%) than in the sham group (7.31%), this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.10). <b>Conclusions</b>: Adverse effects were mild and transient, with no serious safety concerns reported. Based on the results of this interim analysis, the study will proceed due to promising efficacy outcomes and good treatment tolerability.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(14)
Medical University of Lublin (PL)
Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.