How to Build a 24/7 Robotic Acute Care Surgery Program

Abstract Purpose of Review We examined the rationale, feasibility, and requirements for sustaining a 24/7 robotic acute care surgery (ACS) program. Our goal is to outline how continuous robotic coverage can be integrated into emergency surgical care and to identify the critical institutional and operational factors that drive its success. Recent Findings Robotic-assisted techniques are increasingly utilized in emergencies such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, incarcerated hernias, and cholecystitis, with studies reporting reduced conversion-to-open rates, shorter hospital stays, and enhanced ergonomics. Despite these advantages, most institutions limit robotic ACS to daytime hours. Around-the-clock models remain uncommon due to barriers such as staffing logistics, credentialing gaps, and OR access. However, select institutions have successfully implemented 24/7 programs through strong leadership, structured team training, performance monitoring, and financial planning. These experiences demonstrate that with coordinated strategies, barriers can be overcome, enabling broader adoption and potential improvements in patient outcomes. Summary A continuously available robotic ACS program is both feasible and potentially beneficial from clinical and operational standpoints. Its successful implementation requires a multidisciplinary, systems-based approach that integrates robust infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, ongoing training, and defined credentialing pathways. In addition to improving access to minimally invasive surgery, such programs may enhance provider well-being and standardize emergency care delivery. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness, equitable access, and defining outcome metrics to guide broader adoption and sustainable growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Trauma Reports
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-025-00294-2
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Build a 24/7 Robotic Acute Care Surgery Program

Rohit Mehta, Ilya Shnaydman, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Kartik Prabhakaran et al.
Current Trauma Reports
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

How to Build a 24/7 Robotic Acute Care Surgery Program

Rohit Mehta, Ilya Shnaydman, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Kartik Prabhakaran, Rishwanth Vetri, Bardiya Zangbar, Joshua Klein, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Gabriel Froula, Jose Anna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review We examined the rationale, feasibility, and requirements for sustaining a 24/7 robotic acute care surgery (ACS) program. Our goal is to outline how continuous robotic coverage can be integrated into emergency surgical care and to identify the critical institutional and operational factors that drive its success. Recent Findings Robotic-assisted techniques are increasingly utilized in emergencies such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, incarcerated hernias, and cholecystitis, with studies reporting reduced conversion-to-open rates, shorter hospital stays, and enhanced ergonomics. Despite these advantages, most institutions limit robotic ACS to daytime hours. Around-the-clock models remain uncommon due to barriers such as staffing logistics, credentialing gaps, and OR access. However, select institutions have successfully implemented 24/7 programs through strong leadership, structured team training, performance monitoring, and financial planning. These experiences demonstrate that with coordinated strategies, barriers can be overcome, enabling broader adoption and potential improvements in patient outcomes. Summary A continuously available robotic ACS program is both feasible and potentially beneficial from clinical and operational standpoints. Its successful implementation requires a multidisciplinary, systems-based approach that integrates robust infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, ongoing training, and defined credentialing pathways. In addition to improving access to minimally invasive surgery, such programs may enhance provider well-being and standardize emergency care delivery. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness, equitable access, and defining outcome metrics to guide broader adoption and sustainable growth.

Current Trauma ReportsVol. 11(1)
Westchester Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.