Professionalism and Trustworthiness in AI-Assisted Workplace Writing: The Benefits and Drawbacks of Writing With AI

This study explores perceptions of managers who use AI-assisted writing for workplace communication tasks. Prior scholarship has established the professionalism of the text of AI-generated workplace writing, but perceptions of message senders who use AI have not previously been explored. To capture professionals’ perceptions of email authorship, a survey was conducted of 1,100 working professionals. In a two (directionality of communication) by four (levels of AI assistance) study, respondents were asked to evaluate the authorship of an AI-assisted message congratulating a team for meeting goals and setting new objectives. The results suggest that, despite positive impressions of professionalism in AI-assisted writing, managers who use AI for routine communication tasks put their trustworthiness at risk when using medium- to high-levels of AI assistance, as respondents in these conditions begin to question the authorship, confidence, caring, sincerity, and ability of senders. These results contribute to ongoing research into the effectiveness of AI-mediated interpersonal workplace communication by suggesting parameters for practical use and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251350599
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professionalism and Trustworthiness in AI-Assisted Workplace Writing: The Benefits and Drawbacks of Writing With AI

Anthony W. Coman, Peter W. Cardon
5 citations
International Journal of Business Communication
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.27
article

Professionalism and Trustworthiness in AI-Assisted Workplace Writing: The Benefits and Drawbacks of Writing With AI

Anthony W. Coman, Peter W. Cardon
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study explores perceptions of managers who use AI-assisted writing for workplace communication tasks. Prior scholarship has established the professionalism of the text of AI-generated workplace writing, but perceptions of message senders who use AI have not previously been explored. To capture professionals’ perceptions of email authorship, a survey was conducted of 1,100 working professionals. In a two (directionality of communication) by four (levels of AI assistance) study, respondents were asked to evaluate the authorship of an AI-assisted message congratulating a team for meeting goals and setting new objectives. The results suggest that, despite positive impressions of professionalism in AI-assisted writing, managers who use AI for routine communication tasks put their trustworthiness at risk when using medium- to high-levels of AI assistance, as respondents in these conditions begin to question the authorship, confidence, caring, sincerity, and ability of senders. These results contribute to ongoing research into the effectiveness of AI-mediated interpersonal workplace communication by suggesting parameters for practical use and directions for future research.

International Journal of Business Communication
University of Southern California (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.