Searching for the Place of National Cartography in the Process of Harmonization of Specialties and Fields of Knowledge

The article compares approaches to forming a list of branches and specialties for applicants seeking education and scientific degrees in Ukraine and other countries worldwide. It offers suggestions for addressing the current challenges facing geography and cartography in Ukraine. The article describes the process of removing cartography from the list of specialties in which specialists are trained in Ukraine. The century-old history of the concept of ​​harmonizing specialties and branches of knowledge is examined, and the experience of harmonizing national and international systems of learning branches in several European countries, including Poland, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, is analyzed. The peculiarities of each national system for determining the place of geography and cartography are noted. One of the advantages of the national educational systems of highly developed European countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom, is the preservation of all scientific directions and developments over a long period of their existence, with cartography being given a separate place in the system of natural sciences. The main drawback of the current list of Fields of Knowledge and Specialties in Ukraine is the attribution of geography to different fields of knowledge, as well as the lack of a detailed list of sciences included in the E5 Earth Sciences group. The relevant structures of the Ministry of Education and Science, in cooperation with the country’s leading geographers and geologists, should urgently detail the list of sciences included in the List under codes C6 and E4.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ukrainian geographical journal
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2025.02.113
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Searching for the Place of National Cartography in the Process of Harmonization of Specialties and Fields of Knowledge

Yuliia Prasul, Vilina Peresadko, Oleg Dmytrykov
Ukrainian geographical journal
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

Searching for the Place of National Cartography in the Process of Harmonization of Specialties and Fields of Knowledge

Yuliia Prasul, Vilina Peresadko, Oleg Dmytrykov
article en

Abstract

The article compares approaches to forming a list of branches and specialties for applicants seeking education and scientific degrees in Ukraine and other countries worldwide. It offers suggestions for addressing the current challenges facing geography and cartography in Ukraine. The article describes the process of removing cartography from the list of specialties in which specialists are trained in Ukraine. The century-old history of the concept of ​​harmonizing specialties and branches of knowledge is examined, and the experience of harmonizing national and international systems of learning branches in several European countries, including Poland, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, is analyzed. The peculiarities of each national system for determining the place of geography and cartography are noted. One of the advantages of the national educational systems of highly developed European countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom, is the preservation of all scientific directions and developments over a long period of their existence, with cartography being given a separate place in the system of natural sciences. The main drawback of the current list of Fields of Knowledge and Specialties in Ukraine is the attribution of geography to different fields of knowledge, as well as the lack of a detailed list of sciences included in the E5 Earth Sciences group. The relevant structures of the Ministry of Education and Science, in cooperation with the country’s leading geographers and geologists, should urgently detail the list of sciences included in the List under codes C6 and E4.

Ukrainian geographical journal(2)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Searching for the Place of National Cartography in the Process of Harmonization of Specialties and Fields of Knowledge — Yuliia Prasul, Vilina Peresadko, et al. · Ukrainian geographical journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS