Sejm 1646 roku. Uwagi na temat procedury parlamentarnej

The Sejm of year 1646 was one of the most difficult during the reign of king Władysław IV, especially due to the argument that took place between the political forces over the monarch’s resignation from the war against the Ottoman Porte. Due to the fact that this problem had been presented in the historiography, the purpose of this article was to present the Sejm as an institution. King’s attitude, disputes over the issue of Trubczewsk and the activity of dissidents at the end of the Sejm’s session led to the parliamentary obstruction. It was particularly disturbed by deputies having the support of important magnates, the passivitas state introduced by them could be broken only by agreeing to their demands. During the Sejm, one of the deputies also left the chamber once, but the remaining deputies showed concern for maintaining the parliamentary procedure. The deputies tried to deal with the growing problems by convening the various committees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prace Historyczne
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844069ph.24.028.21444
Primary Topic
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sejm 1646 roku. Uwagi na temat procedury parlamentarnej

Aleksandra Kwaśniewska
Prace Historyczne
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
article

Sejm 1646 roku. Uwagi na temat procedury parlamentarnej

Aleksandra Kwaśniewska
article en

Abstract

The Sejm of year 1646 was one of the most difficult during the reign of king Władysław IV, especially due to the argument that took place between the political forces over the monarch’s resignation from the war against the Ottoman Porte. Due to the fact that this problem had been presented in the historiography, the purpose of this article was to present the Sejm as an institution. King’s attitude, disputes over the issue of Trubczewsk and the activity of dissidents at the end of the Sejm’s session led to the parliamentary obstruction. It was particularly disturbed by deputies having the support of important magnates, the passivitas state introduced by them could be broken only by agreeing to their demands. During the Sejm, one of the deputies also left the chamber once, but the remaining deputies showed concern for maintaining the parliamentary procedure. The deputies tried to deal with the growing problems by convening the various committees.

Prace HistoryczneVol. 151(3)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.