Image quality and radiation dose of reduced-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with silver filter and deep learning reconstruction

To assess the image quality and radiation dose between reduced-dose CT with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) using SilverBeam filter and standard dose with iterative reconstruction (IR) in abdominopelvic CT. In total, 182 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 14 years; 100 men) were included. Standard-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 100 kVp, automatic tube current modulation, and IR reconstruction, whereas reduced-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 120 kVp, a SilverBeam filter, and DLR. Additionally, a contrast-enhanced (CE)-boost image was obtained for reduced-dose scanning. Radiation dose, objective, and subjective image analyses were performed in each body mass index (BMI) category. The radiation dose for SilverBeam with DLR was significantly lower than that of standard dose with IR, with an average reduction in the effective dose of 59.0% (1.87 vs. 4.57 mSv). Standard dose with IR (10.59 ± 1.75) and SilverBeam with DLR (10.60 ± 1.08) showed no significant difference in image noise (p = 0.99). In the obese group (BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), there were no significant differences in SNRs of the liver, pancreas, and spleen between standard dose with IR and SilverBeam with DLR. SilverBeam with DLR + CE-boost demonstrated significantly better SNRs and CNRs, compared with standard dose with IR and SilverBeam with DLR. DLR combined with silver filter is effective for routine abdominopelvic CT, achieving a clearly reduced radiation dose while providing image quality that is non-inferior to standard dose with IR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11184-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image quality and radiation dose of reduced-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with silver filter and deep learning reconstruction

Chuluunbaatar Otgonbaatar, Sang-Hyun Jeon, Hackjoon Shim, Jhii-Hyun Ahn et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiation Dose and Imaging
1.36
article

Image quality and radiation dose of reduced-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with silver filter and deep learning reconstruction

Chuluunbaatar Otgonbaatar, Sang-Hyun Jeon, Hackjoon Shim, Jhii-Hyun Ahn, Jin Woo Kim, Sung-Jin Cha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To assess the image quality and radiation dose between reduced-dose CT with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) using SilverBeam filter and standard dose with iterative reconstruction (IR) in abdominopelvic CT. In total, 182 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 14 years; 100 men) were included. Standard-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 100 kVp, automatic tube current modulation, and IR reconstruction, whereas reduced-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 120 kVp, a SilverBeam filter, and DLR. Additionally, a contrast-enhanced (CE)-boost image was obtained for reduced-dose scanning. Radiation dose, objective, and subjective image analyses were performed in each body mass index (BMI) category. The radiation dose for SilverBeam with DLR was significantly lower than that of standard dose with IR, with an average reduction in the effective dose of 59.0% (1.87 vs. 4.57 mSv). Standard dose with IR (10.59 ± 1.75) and SilverBeam with DLR (10.60 ± 1.08) showed no significant difference in image noise (p = 0.99). In the obese group (BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), there were no significant differences in SNRs of the liver, pancreas, and spleen between standard dose with IR and SilverBeam with DLR. SilverBeam with DLR + CE-boost demonstrated significantly better SNRs and CNRs, compared with standard dose with IR and SilverBeam with DLR. DLR combined with silver filter is effective for routine abdominopelvic CT, achieving a clearly reduced radiation dose while providing image quality that is non-inferior to standard dose with IR.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Seoul National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.