The Regime of Self‐Optimization: Lived Experiences of Enforced Digital Inclusion by Low‐Literate Citizens

This article introduces the regime of self‐optimization, a theoretical framework to understand how disadvantaged citizens are compelled to continually improve their digital skills and capacities to meet the demands of an increasingly digital welfare state. Consequently, we ask: How do low‐literate Dutch citizens experience the regime of self‐optimization in their everyday lives? Drawing on historical and discursive underpinnings of governmentality, responsibilization, and standardization, we propose a conceptual framework to examine how top‐down digital norms impose moral and practical obligations for self‐optimization. We distinguish two dimensions of self‐optimization: a vertical and horizontal mode. The first emphasizes extrinsic norms, efficiency, and personal responsibility, effectively attributing digital exclusion to personal failure while overlooking more profound structural barriers. The latter centers around intrinsic motivations, social support structures, trust, and context‐sensitive adaptation, thereby fostering inclusion and agency, although its effectiveness depends on social resources. Drawing on a longitudinal ethnographic study conducted in libraries, a community center, and a vocational school in the Netherlands (41 participant observations; 23 semi‐structured interviews), our findings show how these competing dimensions collide in the everyday lives of low‐literate Dutch citizens, revealing frictions that highlight broader socio‐political tensions in digitized welfare systems. These tensions highlight how the mechanisms intended to foster digital inclusion, by encouraging citizens to optimize themselves, can instead reinforce marginalization. By centering the experiences of marginalized groups, researchers and policymakers can more effectively address socio‐economic, linguistic, and cultural barriers to digital inclusion. This challenges the assumption that universalized digital inclusion initiatives are sufficient for all citizens. The regime of self‐optimization, thus, provides insights for designing human‐centered, context‐sensitive digital inclusion interventions in rapidly digitizing societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10052
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Regime of Self‐Optimization: Lived Experiences of Enforced Digital Inclusion by Low‐Literate Citizens

Joëlle Swart, Marcel Broersma, Alexander Smit
2 citations
Social Inclusion
Social Media and Politics
7.73
article

The Regime of Self‐Optimization: Lived Experiences of Enforced Digital Inclusion by Low‐Literate Citizens

Joëlle Swart, Marcel Broersma, Alexander Smit
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article introduces the regime of self‐optimization, a theoretical framework to understand how disadvantaged citizens are compelled to continually improve their digital skills and capacities to meet the demands of an increasingly digital welfare state. Consequently, we ask: How do low‐literate Dutch citizens experience the regime of self‐optimization in their everyday lives? Drawing on historical and discursive underpinnings of governmentality, responsibilization, and standardization, we propose a conceptual framework to examine how top‐down digital norms impose moral and practical obligations for self‐optimization. We distinguish two dimensions of self‐optimization: a vertical and horizontal mode. The first emphasizes extrinsic norms, efficiency, and personal responsibility, effectively attributing digital exclusion to personal failure while overlooking more profound structural barriers. The latter centers around intrinsic motivations, social support structures, trust, and context‐sensitive adaptation, thereby fostering inclusion and agency, although its effectiveness depends on social resources. Drawing on a longitudinal ethnographic study conducted in libraries, a community center, and a vocational school in the Netherlands (41 participant observations; 23 semi‐structured interviews), our findings show how these competing dimensions collide in the everyday lives of low‐literate Dutch citizens, revealing frictions that highlight broader socio‐political tensions in digitized welfare systems. These tensions highlight how the mechanisms intended to foster digital inclusion, by encouraging citizens to optimize themselves, can instead reinforce marginalization. By centering the experiences of marginalized groups, researchers and policymakers can more effectively address socio‐economic, linguistic, and cultural barriers to digital inclusion. This challenges the assumption that universalized digital inclusion initiatives are sufficient for all citizens. The regime of self‐optimization, thus, provides insights for designing human‐centered, context‐sensitive digital inclusion interventions in rapidly digitizing societies.

Social InclusionVol. 13
University of Groningen (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Media and Politics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.