Comparative Study between Benefits of Desarda Tissue Repair Over Conventional Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty

Objectives Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty is the gold standard, but it is associated with potential complications, including infections and chronic pain. Desarda Tissue Repair, a non-mesh technique, has been proposed as a safer alternative, offering advantages such as reduced complications and quicker recovery. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes, postoperative pain, complications, and recovery times between Desarda Tissue Repair and Conventional Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty in patients with an inguinal hernia. Material and Methods We conducted a comparative study at the People’s Hospital, Bhopal. After approval from the ethics committee and obtaining the informed consent form from the patients, a total of 82 patients meeting the inclusion criteria from March 2023 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups. The duration of surgery, post-operative pain, surgical complications, duration of hospital stay, and time taken to return to normal activity were assessed and compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS software ver. 26.0 Results The present study demonstrated that Desarda Tissue Repair yielded significantly better outcomes compared to Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. The former was associated with shorter symptom duration, surgery time, recovery time, and hospital stay. Patients with Desarda Tissue Repair also reported significantly lower postoperative pain (mean visual analog scale-VAS score of 2.76 ± 2.02 vs. 4.88 ± 2.66, p = 0.03) and fewer complications, with no wound infections, seromas, chronic pain, or loss of sensation, compared with Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. Fewer overall complications (97.56% no complications vs. 73.17% in Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty, p = 0.02) make the Desarda repair a safer and more effective option for inguinal hernia repair. Conclusion The study concludes that Desarda Tissue Repair is a safer and more effective option for inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. It is associated with shorter surgery duration, fewer complications, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery, making it preferable, especially for those wanting to avoid mesh-related complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijrsms_30_2025
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Benefits of Desarda Tissue Repair Over Conventional Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty

Rahul V. Patel, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Asma Azim
International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences
Hernia repair and management
article

Comparative Study between Benefits of Desarda Tissue Repair Over Conventional Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty

Rahul V. Patel, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Asma Azim
article en

Abstract

Objectives Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty is the gold standard, but it is associated with potential complications, including infections and chronic pain. Desarda Tissue Repair, a non-mesh technique, has been proposed as a safer alternative, offering advantages such as reduced complications and quicker recovery. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes, postoperative pain, complications, and recovery times between Desarda Tissue Repair and Conventional Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty in patients with an inguinal hernia. Material and Methods We conducted a comparative study at the People’s Hospital, Bhopal. After approval from the ethics committee and obtaining the informed consent form from the patients, a total of 82 patients meeting the inclusion criteria from March 2023 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups. The duration of surgery, post-operative pain, surgical complications, duration of hospital stay, and time taken to return to normal activity were assessed and compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS software ver. 26.0 Results The present study demonstrated that Desarda Tissue Repair yielded significantly better outcomes compared to Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. The former was associated with shorter symptom duration, surgery time, recovery time, and hospital stay. Patients with Desarda Tissue Repair also reported significantly lower postoperative pain (mean visual analog scale-VAS score of 2.76 ± 2.02 vs. 4.88 ± 2.66, p = 0.03) and fewer complications, with no wound infections, seromas, chronic pain, or loss of sensation, compared with Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. Fewer overall complications (97.56% no complications vs. 73.17% in Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty, p = 0.02) make the Desarda repair a safer and more effective option for inguinal hernia repair. Conclusion The study concludes that Desarda Tissue Repair is a safer and more effective option for inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty. It is associated with shorter surgery duration, fewer complications, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery, making it preferable, especially for those wanting to avoid mesh-related complications.

International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical SciencesVol. 11
College of Medical Sciences (NP), People’s University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.