INFLUENCE OF INFILL AND NOZZLE DIAMETER ON POROSITY OF PLA 3D PRINTED PARTS

This study investigates the influence of infill density, infill pattern, and nozzle diameter on the porosity of polylactic acid (PLA) parts fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Nine different parameter combinations were evaluated using a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array, involving three infill densities (15%, 45%, 75%), three nozzle diameters (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.6 mm), and three infill patterns (grid, cubic, gyroid). Porosity was measured using gravimetric methods and supported by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Results showed that infill density was the most significant factor, reducing porosity from 84.98% at 15% to 28.78% at 75% (p = 0.000). Nozzle diameter also affected porosity, decreasing from 58.17% at 0.2 mm to 55.61% at 0.6 mm (p = 0.062). The influence of infill pattern, while not statistically significant (p = 0.093), was visually evident: the grid pattern consistently resulted in lower porosity (~56.22%) due to uniform filament paths, while the gyroid pattern exhibited the highest porosity (~58.45%) due to its complex, non-intersecting structure. The optimal combination for minimizing porosity included a 75% infill density, grid pattern, and 0.6 mm nozzle diameter. These findings provide valuable guidelines for optimizing FFF parameters to improve the structural quality of PLA printed components.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54684/ijmmt.2025.17.1.31
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INFLUENCE OF INFILL AND NOZZLE DIAMETER ON POROSITY OF PLA 3D PRINTED PARTS

M. Awalludin, Mohamad Kamarol Mohd Jamil, Ahmad Shah Hizam Md Yasir, Ahmad Syamaizar Haji Ahmad Sabli et al.
International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

INFLUENCE OF INFILL AND NOZZLE DIAMETER ON POROSITY OF PLA 3D PRINTED PARTS

M. Awalludin, Mohamad Kamarol Mohd Jamil, Ahmad Shah Hizam Md Yasir, Ahmad Syamaizar Haji Ahmad Sabli, Nor Aiman Sukindar, Shafie Kamaruddin, Mohamad Talhah Al Hafiz Mohd Khata, Ahmad Azlan Ab Aziz, Muhammad Afiq Iman Mohd Nazli
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of infill density, infill pattern, and nozzle diameter on the porosity of polylactic acid (PLA) parts fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Nine different parameter combinations were evaluated using a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array, involving three infill densities (15%, 45%, 75%), three nozzle diameters (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.6 mm), and three infill patterns (grid, cubic, gyroid). Porosity was measured using gravimetric methods and supported by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Results showed that infill density was the most significant factor, reducing porosity from 84.98% at 15% to 28.78% at 75% (p = 0.000). Nozzle diameter also affected porosity, decreasing from 58.17% at 0.2 mm to 55.61% at 0.6 mm (p = 0.062). The influence of infill pattern, while not statistically significant (p = 0.093), was visually evident: the grid pattern consistently resulted in lower porosity (~56.22%) due to uniform filament paths, while the gyroid pattern exhibited the highest porosity (~58.45%) due to its complex, non-intersecting structure. The optimal combination for minimizing porosity included a 75% infill density, grid pattern, and 0.6 mm nozzle diameter. These findings provide valuable guidelines for optimizing FFF parameters to improve the structural quality of PLA printed components.

International Journal of Modern Manufacturing TechnologiesVol. 17(1)
Universiti Teknologi Brunei, International Islamic University Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.