Leng review offers “pragmatic solution” in attempt to heal rift between doctors and PAs

The roles of physician associate (PA) and anaesthesia associate (AA) should not be abolished but be renamed “physician assistants” and “physician assistants in anaesthesia,” Gillian Leng’s independent review has recommended.1 Leng acknowledged that her “pragmatic” solution “won’t be universally popular.” She said that she found “no convincing reasons” to abolish the roles of PAs and AAs but that changes were needed to embed the roles into the NHS workforce effectively. In autumn 2024 the government commissioned Leng, president of the Royal Society of Medicine and former chief executive of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, to head a rapid review into the safety and scope of the roles of PAs and AAs.2 This followed growing anger in the medical profession about the way PAs were being deployed and regulated. Leng’s 18 recommendations, based on the “best available evidence,” aim to represent a “pragmatic, sensible way forward that will provide clarity and enable effective change” (box 1). She emphasised that her report must be an opportunity “to reset the hostility” in the debate and stimulate effective collaboration for the future. Box 1 ### Leng’s key recommendationsRETURN TO TEXT

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1482
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
47.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leng review offers “pragmatic solution” in attempt to heal rift between doctors and PAs

Jacqui Wise
17 citations
BMJ
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
47.86
article

Leng review offers “pragmatic solution” in attempt to heal rift between doctors and PAs

Jacqui Wise
article en
17 citations

Abstract

The roles of physician associate (PA) and anaesthesia associate (AA) should not be abolished but be renamed “physician assistants” and “physician assistants in anaesthesia,” Gillian Leng’s independent review has recommended.1 Leng acknowledged that her “pragmatic” solution “won’t be universally popular.” She said that she found “no convincing reasons” to abolish the roles of PAs and AAs but that changes were needed to embed the roles into the NHS workforce effectively. In autumn 2024 the government commissioned Leng, president of the Royal Society of Medicine and former chief executive of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, to head a rapid review into the safety and scope of the roles of PAs and AAs.2 This followed growing anger in the medical profession about the way PAs were being deployed and regulated. Leng’s 18 recommendations, based on the “best available evidence,” aim to represent a “pragmatic, sensible way forward that will provide clarity and enable effective change” (box 1). She emphasised that her report must be an opportunity “to reset the hostility” in the debate and stimulate effective collaboration for the future. Box 1 ### Leng’s key recommendationsRETURN TO TEXT

BMJVol. 390
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
47.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.