A Comparative Study on the Structural and Functional Features of Four-Word Bundles Used by English Native and Non-Native Upper-Level Students in the Economics Research Papers

Four-word lexical bundles are crucial in assessing English proficiency in academic writing. This study aims to examine similarities and differences in four-word lexical bundles' structural and functional use by native and non-native English-speaking students in economics papers from the MICUSP database, exploring reasons for these differences related to second language acquisition and teaching, and suggests improvements. Corpora were first cleaned and analyzed using AntConc, then categorized by Biber et al.'s structural taxonomy[1] and Hyland's functional taxonomy[2]. Results found that Native students favored noun/prepositional phrases and research-oriented patterns, while non-natives used more varied verb phrases and text-oriented patterns. The study discussed causes like L1 transfer in L2 acquisition and text focus in L2 teaching, aiming to inform future ESL pedagogy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Comparative Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/trance.2025.070211
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on the Structural and Functional Features of Four-Word Bundles Used by English Native and Non-Native Upper-Level Students in the Economics Research Papers

Transactions on Comparative Education
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

A Comparative Study on the Structural and Functional Features of Four-Word Bundles Used by English Native and Non-Native Upper-Level Students in the Economics Research Papers

article en

Abstract

Four-word lexical bundles are crucial in assessing English proficiency in academic writing. This study aims to examine similarities and differences in four-word lexical bundles' structural and functional use by native and non-native English-speaking students in economics papers from the MICUSP database, exploring reasons for these differences related to second language acquisition and teaching, and suggests improvements. Corpora were first cleaned and analyzed using AntConc, then categorized by Biber et al.'s structural taxonomy[1] and Hyland's functional taxonomy[2]. Results found that Native students favored noun/prepositional phrases and research-oriented patterns, while non-natives used more varied verb phrases and text-oriented patterns. The study discussed causes like L1 transfer in L2 acquisition and text focus in L2 teaching, aiming to inform future ESL pedagogy.

Transactions on Comparative EducationVol. 7(2)
Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.