Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Following Cesarean Section: A Randomized Blinded Trial

Background: Postoperative sedation and analgesia are of great importance in puerperas following caesarean section (CS). Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the sedative and analgesic effects of midazolam and dexmedetomidine (DX) in patients undergoing CS. Methods: A total of 135 female patients scheduled for CS were randomly allocated into three groups using block randomization with a parallel sampling method: 0.5 µg/kg DX (n = 45), 2 mg midazolam (n = 45), and normal saline (NS) (n = 45). Medications were administered following delivery. Hemodynamic variables, level of sedation (assessed using the Ramsay sedation score), and level of analgesia (measured using the Visual Analog Scale) were recorded and compared at multiple time intervals. Results: The mean age of participants was 25.6 ± 3.9 years. The intensity of pain was significantly lower in the DX group compared to the midazolam and control groups at 3-hour, 6-hour, and 12-hour intervals (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the midazolam and control groups (P > 0.05). Both drug groups exhibited similar levels of sedation, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported complications. Conclusions: Compared to midazolam, add-on therapy with DX was associated with superior pain control following CS. The DX and midazolam demonstrated comparable sedative effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-149842
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Following Cesarean Section: A Randomized Blinded Trial

Bahador Bagheri, Babak Hosseinzadeh Zoroofchi, Elham Saffarieh, Atousa Naviafar
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Following Cesarean Section: A Randomized Blinded Trial

Bahador Bagheri, Babak Hosseinzadeh Zoroofchi, Elham Saffarieh, Atousa Naviafar
article en

Abstract

Background: Postoperative sedation and analgesia are of great importance in puerperas following caesarean section (CS). Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the sedative and analgesic effects of midazolam and dexmedetomidine (DX) in patients undergoing CS. Methods: A total of 135 female patients scheduled for CS were randomly allocated into three groups using block randomization with a parallel sampling method: 0.5 µg/kg DX (n = 45), 2 mg midazolam (n = 45), and normal saline (NS) (n = 45). Medications were administered following delivery. Hemodynamic variables, level of sedation (assessed using the Ramsay sedation score), and level of analgesia (measured using the Visual Analog Scale) were recorded and compared at multiple time intervals. Results: The mean age of participants was 25.6 ± 3.9 years. The intensity of pain was significantly lower in the DX group compared to the midazolam and control groups at 3-hour, 6-hour, and 12-hour intervals (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the midazolam and control groups (P > 0.05). Both drug groups exhibited similar levels of sedation, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported complications. Conclusions: Compared to midazolam, add-on therapy with DX was associated with superior pain control following CS. The DX and midazolam demonstrated comparable sedative effects.

Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health StudiesVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.