EC-IC direct bypass revascularization for intracranial atherosclerosis. Insights beyond the COSS trial

Despite the results of the EC-IC Bypass International Trial and the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS), high-volume centers continue to treat symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic patients with bypass revascularization. This study aimed to analyze our data and assess whether patient characteristics and outcomes differ from those in EC-IC Bypass and COSS trials. Patients with intracranial atherosclerotic occlusions treated by EC-IC bypass from January 2012 to June 2022 were included. Inclusion criteria were: (1) intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion >70 %, (2) transient or permanent ischemic events in the affected territory, and (3) impaired cerebrovascular reactivity demonstrated by acetazolamide-challenged SPECT. Forty-nine patients were included. Half presented bilateral occlusions, and 53.1 % had hemodynamic symptoms. Most were asymptomatic or had mild strokes preoperatively. Postoperatively, mRS worsened in 34.78 % of patients without hemodynamic symptoms, compared to 15 % of symptomatic patients. No significant differences in NIHSS or mRS were observed between pre- and postoperative evaluations. The 30-day complication rate was 20.4 %, with one procedure-related death. High rates of bypass patency (97.95 %) and SPECT improvement (87.75 %) were achieved. Long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke rate was 2 %. EC-IC bypass remains a viable option in carefully selected patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis and impaired cerebrovascular reserve. Patient selection based on clinical and functional criteria is essential. Our results contrast with those of the COSS trial, showing lower recurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke, neurological stability in most patients, and favorable outcomes in individuals with hemodynamic symptoms and contralateral stenosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Neurosurgery X
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100496
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EC-IC direct bypass revascularization for intracranial atherosclerosis. Insights beyond the COSS trial

Carles Lorenzo‐Bosquet, Helena Calvo-Rubio, Fuat Arikán, Carlos Santos et al.
2 citations
World Neurosurgery X
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
3.04
article

EC-IC direct bypass revascularization for intracranial atherosclerosis. Insights beyond the COSS trial

Carles Lorenzo‐Bosquet, Helena Calvo-Rubio, Fuat Arikán, Carlos Santos, Alejandro Tomasello, Silvia Vázquez Sufuentes, Darío Gándara, Marta Rubiera
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite the results of the EC-IC Bypass International Trial and the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS), high-volume centers continue to treat symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic patients with bypass revascularization. This study aimed to analyze our data and assess whether patient characteristics and outcomes differ from those in EC-IC Bypass and COSS trials. Patients with intracranial atherosclerotic occlusions treated by EC-IC bypass from January 2012 to June 2022 were included. Inclusion criteria were: (1) intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion >70 %, (2) transient or permanent ischemic events in the affected territory, and (3) impaired cerebrovascular reactivity demonstrated by acetazolamide-challenged SPECT. Forty-nine patients were included. Half presented bilateral occlusions, and 53.1 % had hemodynamic symptoms. Most were asymptomatic or had mild strokes preoperatively. Postoperatively, mRS worsened in 34.78 % of patients without hemodynamic symptoms, compared to 15 % of symptomatic patients. No significant differences in NIHSS or mRS were observed between pre- and postoperative evaluations. The 30-day complication rate was 20.4 %, with one procedure-related death. High rates of bypass patency (97.95 %) and SPECT improvement (87.75 %) were achieved. Long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke rate was 2 %. EC-IC bypass remains a viable option in carefully selected patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis and impaired cerebrovascular reserve. Patient selection based on clinical and functional criteria is essential. Our results contrast with those of the COSS trial, showing lower recurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke, neurological stability in most patients, and favorable outcomes in individuals with hemodynamic symptoms and contralateral stenosis.

World Neurosurgery XVol. 28
Hebron University (PS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.