Dialectics of Antimicrobial Peptides II: Theoretical Models of Pore Formation and Membrane Protection

Amphipathic peptides are considered promising antibiotics due to their ability to form pores in bacterial membranes. In two companion papers, we analyzed both experimentally and theoretically the mechanisms and consequences of the interaction of two types of amphipathic peptides (magainin and melittin) with lipid membranes. In the companion paper, we experimentally studied this interaction for different peptide concentrations: low or high concentration, and a combination of low concentration followed by the addition of peptides in high concentration. Here we provide the theoretical description of the pore formation mechanisms. In the present work, we theoretically predicted that two peptide molecules are sufficient to induce the formation of a small metastable pore that continuously connects two membrane leaflets and allows peptide and lipid translocation between the leaflets. This mechanism (referred to as local) is thought to operate at low peptide concentrations. At high concentrations, the one-sided adsorption of peptides onto a closed membrane generates a lateral pressure in the contacting lipid monolayer and a lateral tension in the opposing monolayer. Our calculations predicted that such asymmetric pressure/tension would greatly facilitate the formation of large metastable pores at any point on the membrane, regardless of the distance to the nearest peptide molecule. We therefore refer to this mechanism of pore formation as nonlocal. If the application of peptides at low concentration is followed by the addition of high concentration, multiple small metastable pores are predicted to form in the membrane according to the local mechanism. This prevents the generation of a large lateral pressure/tension difference and thus protects the membrane from the formation of large pores. The results of the theoretical analysis are in agreement with the experimental data of the companion paper [Volovik et al., <i>Langmuir</i> 2025].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langmuir
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00963
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialectics of Antimicrobial Peptides II: Theoretical Models of Pore Formation and Membrane Protection

Sergey A. Akimov, Marta V. Volovik, Polina K. Gifer, Zaret G. Denieva et al.
7 citations
Langmuir
Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
8.28
article

Dialectics of Antimicrobial Peptides II: Theoretical Models of Pore Formation and Membrane Protection

Sergey A. Akimov, Marta V. Volovik, Polina K. Gifer, Zaret G. Denieva, Timur R. Galimzyanov, Oleg V. Batishchev, Oleg V. Kondrashov, Peter I. Kuzmin
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Amphipathic peptides are considered promising antibiotics due to their ability to form pores in bacterial membranes. In two companion papers, we analyzed both experimentally and theoretically the mechanisms and consequences of the interaction of two types of amphipathic peptides (magainin and melittin) with lipid membranes. In the companion paper, we experimentally studied this interaction for different peptide concentrations: low or high concentration, and a combination of low concentration followed by the addition of peptides in high concentration. Here we provide the theoretical description of the pore formation mechanisms. In the present work, we theoretically predicted that two peptide molecules are sufficient to induce the formation of a small metastable pore that continuously connects two membrane leaflets and allows peptide and lipid translocation between the leaflets. This mechanism (referred to as local) is thought to operate at low peptide concentrations. At high concentrations, the one-sided adsorption of peptides onto a closed membrane generates a lateral pressure in the contacting lipid monolayer and a lateral tension in the opposing monolayer. Our calculations predicted that such asymmetric pressure/tension would greatly facilitate the formation of large metastable pores at any point on the membrane, regardless of the distance to the nearest peptide molecule. We therefore refer to this mechanism of pore formation as nonlocal. If the application of peptides at low concentration is followed by the addition of high concentration, multiple small metastable pores are predicted to form in the membrane according to the local mechanism. This prevents the generation of a large lateral pressure/tension difference and thus protects the membrane from the formation of large pores. The results of the theoretical analysis are in agreement with the experimental data of the companion paper [Volovik et al., <i>Langmuir</i> 2025].

LangmuirVol. 41(29)
National University of Science and Technology (RU), Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.