The ‘Good Samaritan’: The effects of corporate conflict engagement on public satisfaction and their behavioral intentions

In a time marked by rising geopolitical tensions and societal conflicts, the traditional corporate emphasis on maximizing shareholder value is increasingly evolving towards a more public-oriented approach that includes societal and ethical considerations. Should organizations invest in activities that are not their primary responsibilities? Based on conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations literature, this study examines different corporate actions undertaken during societal conflicts and how these affect public satisfaction and what effects these may have on three public relations outcomes: reputation, word-of-mouth, and financial support. Using an experimental design with the Finnish public in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, this study demonstrates that proactive corporate engagement in conflict mitigation has direct positive effects on financial support and positive word-of-mouth intentions, though not on reputation. However, when public satisfaction and corporate trust are considered, there are positive effects on reputation and word-of-mouth intentions, but not on financial support. Additionally, people’s ethical orientation and conflict severity perception play a role in moderating these effects. This study contributes to the existing literature in conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations in several ways. It enhances theory integration by combining multiple perspectives, providing a comprehensive understanding of societal conflicts and their effects. It contributes to research on societal conflicts by shedding some light into different types of corporate behaviors during societal conflicts and the mechanisms that affect public perceptions of such actions. And it empirically demonstrates that organizations can also gain some public relations outcomes from investing in positive corporate conflict engagement actions. • This study investigates the effects of business engagement on conflicts. • Acting as a ‘Good Samaritan’ can lead to positive public relations outcomes. • Corporate actions with strong public alignment increase public satisfaction. • They positively impact trust, reputation, and word-of-mouth. • People's ethical views affect how they perceive corporate actions in different ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Review
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102607
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘Good Samaritan’: The effects of corporate conflict engagement on public satisfaction and their behavioral intentions

Juha Munnukka, Chiara Valentini, Hui Zhao
Public Relations Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The ‘Good Samaritan’: The effects of corporate conflict engagement on public satisfaction and their behavioral intentions

Juha Munnukka, Chiara Valentini, Hui Zhao
article en

Abstract

In a time marked by rising geopolitical tensions and societal conflicts, the traditional corporate emphasis on maximizing shareholder value is increasingly evolving towards a more public-oriented approach that includes societal and ethical considerations. Should organizations invest in activities that are not their primary responsibilities? Based on conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations literature, this study examines different corporate actions undertaken during societal conflicts and how these affect public satisfaction and what effects these may have on three public relations outcomes: reputation, word-of-mouth, and financial support. Using an experimental design with the Finnish public in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, this study demonstrates that proactive corporate engagement in conflict mitigation has direct positive effects on financial support and positive word-of-mouth intentions, though not on reputation. However, when public satisfaction and corporate trust are considered, there are positive effects on reputation and word-of-mouth intentions, but not on financial support. Additionally, people’s ethical orientation and conflict severity perception play a role in moderating these effects. This study contributes to the existing literature in conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations in several ways. It enhances theory integration by combining multiple perspectives, providing a comprehensive understanding of societal conflicts and their effects. It contributes to research on societal conflicts by shedding some light into different types of corporate behaviors during societal conflicts and the mechanisms that affect public perceptions of such actions. And it empirically demonstrates that organizations can also gain some public relations outcomes from investing in positive corporate conflict engagement actions. • This study investigates the effects of business engagement on conflicts. • Acting as a ‘Good Samaritan’ can lead to positive public relations outcomes. • Corporate actions with strong public alignment increase public satisfaction. • They positively impact trust, reputation, and word-of-mouth. • People's ethical views affect how they perceive corporate actions in different ways.

Public Relations ReviewVol. 51(4)
Lund University (SE), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.