LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR AI: A NECESSARY STEP OR A PERILOUS PATH?

IIn its Resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, the European Parliament calls on the European Commission to consider granting a special legal status to robots, under which the most advanced autonomous robots would be recognized as electronic persons liable for any damage caused by their operations. In this regard, the paper examines the main characteristics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), such as autonomy, opacity, unpredictability and complexity, which can cause problems in the attribution of liability. The paper analyzes whether there are valid reasons for granting (electronic) personhood to the most sophisticated forms of AI. In addition, it examines whether alternative mechanisms, such as the broader application of strict liability, the presumption of fault or causation, no-fault systems, or compulsory insurance, may be used to strike a fair balance between the interests of manufacturers and users of AI systems, as well as third parties.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22190/fulp250304001d
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR AI: A NECESSARY STEP OR A PERILOUS PATH?

Josip Dešić
Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics
Legal principles and applications
article

LEGAL PERSONHOOD FOR AI: A NECESSARY STEP OR A PERILOUS PATH?

Josip Dešić
article en

Abstract

IIn its Resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, the European Parliament calls on the European Commission to consider granting a special legal status to robots, under which the most advanced autonomous robots would be recognized as electronic persons liable for any damage caused by their operations. In this regard, the paper examines the main characteristics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), such as autonomy, opacity, unpredictability and complexity, which can cause problems in the attribution of liability. The paper analyzes whether there are valid reasons for granting (electronic) personhood to the most sophisticated forms of AI. In addition, it examines whether alternative mechanisms, such as the broader application of strict liability, the presumption of fault or causation, no-fault systems, or compulsory insurance, may be used to strike a fair balance between the interests of manufacturers and users of AI systems, as well as third parties.

Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.