A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning

Neurological disorders affect communication ability, social interaction, and a person’s conduct. Early diagnosis and treatment of ASD during the early stages of a person’s life may result in better outcomes and a higher quality of life for patients. Current methods of diagnosis are based on behavioral observations and interviews, which are subjective, time-consuming, and costly. EEG does not include invasive techniques, and it is a safe and painless way of measuring electrical activity in the brain. EEG signals may reflect neural differences and abnormalities related to ASD and serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis. Due to the increase in prevalence, there has been an increased need to develop more sensitive and unbiased diagnostic methods for ASD. ML and DL are two sophisticated methods that researchers developed for detecting ASD by doing neural network analyses. The review paper incorporates the analysis of previous studies; more than 200 works have been analyzed from top publishers like Elsevier, IEEE, MDPI, and Springer, specifically related to EEG signal analysis and feature extraction techniques. It considers significant methods for ASD detection, including SVMs, CNN, and other models like KNN, ResNet50, and ANFIS. Other datasets central in these studies are KAU, BCIAUT-P300, and ADOS-2. The performance metrics adopted in this research include accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For example, the cubic SVM realized an accuracy of 95.8%, while the CNN models reached 95%. Other models, like ResNet50, achieved 99.39%, while ANFIS reached 98.9%. Sensitivity and specificity also showed varying scores across the methods, between 85 and 100%, indicating the high potential of these approaches in ASD diagnosis. Future studies could pay more attention to dataset representativeness improvements and do the clinical validation of these models for better generalization and relevance toward early diagnosis in ASD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning

Norziana Jamil, Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri, Hajir Ammar Hatim
11 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
15.74
article

A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning

Norziana Jamil, Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri, Hajir Ammar Hatim
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Neurological disorders affect communication ability, social interaction, and a person’s conduct. Early diagnosis and treatment of ASD during the early stages of a person’s life may result in better outcomes and a higher quality of life for patients. Current methods of diagnosis are based on behavioral observations and interviews, which are subjective, time-consuming, and costly. EEG does not include invasive techniques, and it is a safe and painless way of measuring electrical activity in the brain. EEG signals may reflect neural differences and abnormalities related to ASD and serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis. Due to the increase in prevalence, there has been an increased need to develop more sensitive and unbiased diagnostic methods for ASD. ML and DL are two sophisticated methods that researchers developed for detecting ASD by doing neural network analyses. The review paper incorporates the analysis of previous studies; more than 200 works have been analyzed from top publishers like Elsevier, IEEE, MDPI, and Springer, specifically related to EEG signal analysis and feature extraction techniques. It considers significant methods for ASD detection, including SVMs, CNN, and other models like KNN, ResNet50, and ANFIS. Other datasets central in these studies are KAU, BCIAUT-P300, and ADOS-2. The performance metrics adopted in this research include accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For example, the cubic SVM realized an accuracy of 95.8%, while the CNN models reached 95%. Other models, like ResNet50, achieved 99.39%, while ANFIS reached 98.9%. Sensitivity and specificity also showed varying scores across the methods, between 85 and 100%, indicating the high potential of these approaches in ASD diagnosis. Future studies could pay more attention to dataset representativeness improvements and do the clinical validation of these models for better generalization and relevance toward early diagnosis in ASD.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(10)
Al Ain University (AE), United Arab Emirates University (AE), University of Kerbala (IQ), University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, University of Kufa (IQ), National University of Malaysia (MY)
United Arab Emirates University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
15.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.