Between Paternalism and a Gender Perspective: Prosecutorial Decision-Making and Focal Concerns in the Global South

Research has shown that women are treated more leniently than men in the criminal justice system, a finding that is often explained by referencing focal concerns theory and stereotypes related to paternalism and chivalry. For the most part, this research is quantitative, has focused on sentencing, and has been conducted in the Global North. We build on this literature by leveraging qualitative data to examine prosecutors’ gender perceptions and how these perceptions shape early decision-making in the Argentinian criminal justice system. We find concerns consistent with those described in prior research among these prosecutors, who often hold paternalistic and stereotypical views of women as weak, vulnerable, less dangerous than men, and primarily as caregivers. But these stereotypes coexist with prosecutors’ views that women are victims of a paternalistic society and that their prosecution could be experienced as revictimization, an unexplored perspective in case processing research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251353748
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Paternalism and a Gender Perspective: Prosecutorial Decision-Making and Focal Concerns in the Global South

Miguel Quintana‐Navarrete, Gustavo Fondevila
1 links
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Between Paternalism and a Gender Perspective: Prosecutorial Decision-Making and Focal Concerns in the Global South

Miguel Quintana‐Navarrete, Gustavo Fondevila
article en

Abstract

Research has shown that women are treated more leniently than men in the criminal justice system, a finding that is often explained by referencing focal concerns theory and stereotypes related to paternalism and chivalry. For the most part, this research is quantitative, has focused on sentencing, and has been conducted in the Global North. We build on this literature by leveraging qualitative data to examine prosecutors’ gender perceptions and how these perceptions shape early decision-making in the Argentinian criminal justice system. We find concerns consistent with those described in prior research among these prosecutors, who often hold paternalistic and stereotypical views of women as weak, vulnerable, less dangerous than men, and primarily as caregivers. But these stereotypes coexist with prosecutors’ views that women are victims of a paternalistic society and that their prosecution could be experienced as revictimization, an unexplored perspective in case processing research.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 52(11)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.