Assessing trust in science: Development and validation of a short scale for adolescents and adults

Trust in science is vital for informed decision-making and societal progress, especially in times of misinformation. Still, trust in science remains underexplored, particularly regarding its development and determinants. To address this gap, we developed a short scale suitable for longitudinal studies. In Study 1, data from 449 adults supported a 4-item unidimensional scale with excellent fit (CFI = .997, RMSEA = .046) and reliability (ω = .835). The scale was negatively correlated with Conspiracy Mentality ( r = -.37) as well as Law-and-Order Beliefs ( r = -.19). Study 2 ( N = 298 parent-adolescent dyads) replicated the model fit and confirmed measurement invariance across age groups. A dyadic model revealed a strong parent-child correlation ( r = .66). Men had higher scores than women. This scale provides researchers and policymakers with a robust tool for assessing trust in science across diverse settings and evaluating interventions to foster this resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.16225
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing trust in science: Development and validation of a short scale for adolescents and adults

Diana Steger, Astrid Schütz
2 citations
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
article

Assessing trust in science: Development and validation of a short scale for adolescents and adults

Diana Steger, Astrid Schütz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Trust in science is vital for informed decision-making and societal progress, especially in times of misinformation. Still, trust in science remains underexplored, particularly regarding its development and determinants. To address this gap, we developed a short scale suitable for longitudinal studies. In Study 1, data from 449 adults supported a 4-item unidimensional scale with excellent fit (CFI = .997, RMSEA = .046) and reliability (ω = .835). The scale was negatively correlated with Conspiracy Mentality ( r = -.37) as well as Law-and-Order Beliefs ( r = -.19). Study 2 ( N = 298 parent-adolescent dyads) replicated the model fit and confirmed measurement invariance across age groups. A dyadic model revealed a strong parent-child correlation ( r = .66). Men had higher scores than women. This scale provides researchers and policymakers with a robust tool for assessing trust in science across diverse settings and evaluating interventions to foster this resource.

Measurement Instruments for the Social SciencesVol. 7
Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing trust in science: Development and validation of a short scale for adolescents and adults — Diana Steger, Astrid Schütz · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS