Managing a privileged group identity – Adaption and validation of a German 4D-scale

In the present paper we introduce a German measure of managing a privileged group identity. We translated and adapted the 4D-Scale (Shuman et al., 2024) to the German context and validated it across three distinct samples. Results of Study 1 ( N = 346), Study 2 ( N = 342), and Study 3 ( N = 204) confirm the psychometric qualities of the German measure and replicate the 5-factor-structure including the management strategies Defend, Deny, Distance from Inequality, Distance from Identity and Dismantle. Moreover, Studies 1 and 2 provide evidence for the measure’s construct validity and measurement invariance, while Study 3 offers additional support of its predictive validity and test-retest reliability within two weeks. The content of the first item of the Distancing from Identity subscale is not valid and is therefore not recommended for studies in the German context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.16079
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Family Support in Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing a privileged group identity – Adaption and validation of a German 4D-scale

Frank Asbrock, A. C. Schröder
3 citations
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
Family Support in Illness
12.60
article

Managing a privileged group identity – Adaption and validation of a German 4D-scale

Frank Asbrock, A. C. Schröder
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the present paper we introduce a German measure of managing a privileged group identity. We translated and adapted the 4D-Scale (Shuman et al., 2024) to the German context and validated it across three distinct samples. Results of Study 1 ( N = 346), Study 2 ( N = 342), and Study 3 ( N = 204) confirm the psychometric qualities of the German measure and replicate the 5-factor-structure including the management strategies Defend, Deny, Distance from Inequality, Distance from Identity and Dismantle. Moreover, Studies 1 and 2 provide evidence for the measure’s construct validity and measurement invariance, while Study 3 offers additional support of its predictive validity and test-retest reliability within two weeks. The content of the first item of the Distancing from Identity subscale is not valid and is therefore not recommended for studies in the German context.

Measurement Instruments for the Social SciencesVol. 7
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Family Support in Illness
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing a privileged group identity – Adaption and validation of a German 4D-scale — Frank Asbrock, A. C. Schröder · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS