‘Buying’ or ‘making’ decent work? Varieties of insourcing public services

Bringing outsourced public services back in-house and thus ‘making’ instead of ‘buying’ decent work now features in policy debates and is a common policy priority of labour movements and unions with public sector membership. Theoretically at least, bringing workers (back) under the rules and standards governing direct public sector employment is a particularly effective and simple way of raising pay levels, improving work schedules and facilitating worker voice. In the past, public sector outsourcing took place within the framework of so-called ‘variegated neoliberalisation’. In a similar vein, current forms of organisational and institutional experimentation tend to be partial, fragmented processes of de-marketisation via insourcing. Drawing on empirical evidence from Germany, France and the United Kingdom, this article explores different trajectories followed by such partial re-insourcing processes and analyses how they are shaped by legacies of the past and how current conjunctural trends are to some extent aimed at correcting for these legacies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589251340019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Buying’ or ‘making’ decent work? Varieties of insourcing public services

François‐Xavier Devetter, Julie Valentin, Stephen Mustchin, Karen Jaehrling
1 citations
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

‘Buying’ or ‘making’ decent work? Varieties of insourcing public services

François‐Xavier Devetter, Julie Valentin, Stephen Mustchin, Karen Jaehrling
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Bringing outsourced public services back in-house and thus ‘making’ instead of ‘buying’ decent work now features in policy debates and is a common policy priority of labour movements and unions with public sector membership. Theoretically at least, bringing workers (back) under the rules and standards governing direct public sector employment is a particularly effective and simple way of raising pay levels, improving work schedules and facilitating worker voice. In the past, public sector outsourcing took place within the framework of so-called ‘variegated neoliberalisation’. In a similar vein, current forms of organisational and institutional experimentation tend to be partial, fragmented processes of de-marketisation via insourcing. Drawing on empirical evidence from Germany, France and the United Kingdom, this article explores different trajectories followed by such partial re-insourcing processes and analyses how they are shaped by legacies of the past and how current conjunctural trends are to some extent aimed at correcting for these legacies.

Transfer European Review of Labour and ResearchVol. 31(2)
Université de Lille (FR), Race Equality Foundation (GB), Institut de recherches économiques et sociales (FR), Centre d'Etudes Superieures Industrielles (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Buying’ or ‘making’ decent work? Varieties of insourcing public services — François‐Xavier Devetter, Julie Valentin, et al. · Transfer European Review of Labour and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS