Evaluation of Postgraduate Professional Courses in a Forestry University by 10-Dimensional Analysis under the Differences of Majors and Grades
本文以某地方林业高校为研究对象,利用问卷星平台开展研究生专业课程评教工作。构建包含10个维度的评教指标体系,通过对回收的86份有效问卷进行信效度分析、因子分析、相关性分析以及专业和年级差异分析等,揭示了不同专业、年级研究生对专业课程评价的差异特征。研究发现机械工程相关专业与农业专硕在教学组织方面差异显著,研一和研二在“第一印象因子”上存在明显不同,且构建的评价体系具有一定通用性。本研究为研究生专业课程评价提供了新视角和实证依据,在此基础上提出优化评教指标体系、加强过程管理、强化结果应用、拓展数据收集方式以及推进信息化建设等建议,以更好地开展研究生评教工作,提升研究生课程教学质量。This paper takes a local forestry university as the research object and conducts the evaluation of postgraduate professional courses through the Wenjuanxing platform. A 10-dimensional evaluation index system is constructed. Through reliability and validity analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis, and analysis of differences among majors and grades of 86 valid questionnaires collected, the differential characteristics of postgraduate evaluations of professional courses in different majors and grades are revealed. The research finds that there are significant differences in teaching organization between mechanical engineering-related majors and agricultural master students, and there are obvious differences between the first-year and second-year postgraduates in the “first impression factor”. Moreover, the constructed evaluation system has certain universality. This research provides a new perspective and empirical basis for the evaluation of postgraduate professional courses. On this basis, suggestions such as optimizing the evaluation index system, strengthening process management, enhancing the application of results, expanding data collection methods, and promoting informatization construction are put forward to better carry out the evaluation of postgraduate courses and improve the teaching quality of postgraduate courses.
Authors
- 良辉 钱
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Education
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.1571233
- Primary Topic
- Urban and spatial planning
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00